Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — xp84

xp84

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 23, 2011, 11:55 PM UTC
HN karma
8,585
Public activity
3,931 items

About xp84

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49251476

    I have to agree with your overall take (only caveat being that I know too little about hardware to know if it's well-founded). The incentives are such that if it's possible to make…

  2. comment
    Comment #49251384

    > given the number of stories of parents who seem to hand their children their credit card, then complain about them racking up thousands of dollars on Roblox or whatever Sure, but…

  3. comment
    Comment #49251316

    I use them. First of all, they're still absolute dogshit (but Apple promises good changes in next OS?). And the choice is to either allow social media in its current, extremely tox…

  4. comment
    Comment #49251105

    This sounds like a hot take, but I'm way less concerned with sketchy porn sites (mostly for the kind of reasons you say which boil down to ... they're sketchy). I'm more concerned …

  5. comment
    Comment #49251006

    Shrinkflation is to me the best example of why pure short-term-ism is a cancer. The first jackass to do it, say by taking a soup can of 16 ounces and adjusting it to 15.75oz, it bo…

  6. comment
    Comment #49250915

    OP didn't say any chain, so his argument is technically not falsifiable, but that also makes it incredibly dubious.

  7. comment
    Comment #49250900

    Your Step 2 assumes complete idiot parents. Parents who hand their kids a new device without adding any parental controls (A) are already in the minority today - I know a lot of pa…

  8. comment
    Comment #49250773

    > then I can configure my kids' devices to disallow that C'mon. We all know parents are far more likely to tap "OK" for "Allow personalized social feeds?" than they are to knowingl…

  9. comment
    Comment #49250692

    Great, let's legalize recreational fentanyl too, since 'whatever people seem to like' is good for society. In this case, unless you're a child, nobody's trying to control what cont…

  10. comment
    Comment #49250680

    Can you back that up? > Step 2: 'oh look at all these people bypassing the law. It's so simple for a child to watch porn with this.' This would be a demonstrably stupid argument. A…

  11. comment
    Comment #49250582

    Exactly. Fortunately, the kids we're most concerned with - young ones who just want to access their brainrot - has very little overlap with Linux users anyway. So, while I hate thi…

  12. comment
    Comment #49250518

    Or alternatively - you could recognize that normal people are getting more and more pissed off by the fact that social media companies are force-feeding garbage into their kids eye…

  13. comment
    Comment #49250430

    What? The GP comment is one single line which states that it just "will" happen.

  14. comment
    Comment #49250419

    Hard agree. I don't think we allowed video store operators in 1995 to just let kids wander into the back room and rent porn, but we're so used to there just being "no rules" online…

  15. comment
    Comment #49250355

    Re: your last paragraph I actually agree with you, if you mandate that the site has to look for an affirmative signal and if it doesn't get one, has to assume the user is the young…

  16. comment
    Comment #49250233

    Why then did this completely leave out verification? Parents want and accept the out-of-box declaration idea. It requires no ID, no face scans, no "ID dot ME" or whatever. As paren…

  17. comment
    Comment #49250198

    Did you read the law? It actually imposes very (in my humble opinion) good rules on the content providers, specifically social media. We know why social media is addictive - the pe…

  18. comment
    Comment #49250146

    Serious question: This is a out-of-box "ask for age" requirement. No one is "verifying" anything. Why are we using this misleading headline? Face scans, ID cards, all that stuff th…

  19. comment
    Comment #49247463

    That's why crap companies like Dreyers mostly doesn't sell it anymore, they sell "Frozen Dairy Dessert" in fine print but with giant ice-cream-evocative words above it.

  20. comment
    Comment #49247449

    The burger patties were absolutely not 1/8 pound. I can assure you from experience as a Professional McDonald's Worker in 2003 that those were 10:1 patties then as well. I can also…

  21. comment
    Comment #49247428

    Let's just take a moment to appreciate the weasel who wrote this utter trash response. From the article: > A Mars spokesperson said: "Over the last 35 years, we have made a number …

  22. comment
    Comment #49238643

    This just means you’ve accepted URLs as something different than they were made to be. If the resource no longer exists - fine, c’est la vie. Otherwise, there should never be any n…

  23. comment
    Comment #49211037

    This is exactly correct ^ and I’m not even aligned with Democrats. There’s no end to the ego and butt-hurt of that man, and conversely, he’s the easiest to exploit via flattery of …

  24. comment
    Comment #49200075

    Right? When Apple expects $149 minimum for their extremely mediocre membrane keyboard, and its only feature is the one they cheat to keep exclusive, it's embarrassing how much bett…

  25. comment
    Comment #49199860

    Not arguing with the general usefulness of the USB hub, but Apple chooses to make their Touch ID sensor 100% proprietary, so the inclusion of a hub is a separate topic to the comme…