Viewing profile — xilun666
xilun666
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Mar 19, 2010, 11:11 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 20
- Public activity
- 12 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About xilun666
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #1773343
You should exclude days of the year if possible, hitler seems to be directly related to most :/
-
comment
Comment #1497607
Indeed, with enough magical legal verbiage and enough slightly unrelated drawing, you could. It probably would not be a valid patent, or maybe only valid on some not too interestin…
-
comment
Comment #1375556
Given the price of the engineer sitting on that seat, that remains reasonable.
-
comment
Comment #1353815
You seems to think most computers are complicated, with huge amount of memory needing dedicated and scalable components. This is not the case. Most computers are tiny; the kind of …
-
comment
Comment #1319871
The authors basically says that it does not always like when people changes his stuff, so he thinks it's fine to do a kind of read only open source with additional unwritten rights…
-
comment
Comment #1298603
They are a bunch of morons. Give us their names, so we never deal with them ;)
-
comment
Comment #1277480
Doing so, you expose yourself in propagating penetration from a compromised server to a previously secure one.
-
comment
Comment #1243544
yeah, war is a mess, context exists on a battlefield, let's destroy more medevacs, YEAH fire in the hole.
-
comment
Comment #1219915
Branching At the beginning you're are not even conscious that you can, but once you've discovered the power it gives you, you will branch twice a day just because you can (and more…
-
comment
Comment #1207054
While the author says stuffs like "not to be used by bad persons", he also writes long shits about evading pursuit in the woods, killing dogs as needed, or getting out of cars whil…
-
comment
Comment #1207028
The contrast that you describe between the state of spirit of sysadmins vs. programmers seems to mean that programmers do not need to consider impact on the rest of the architectur…
-
comment
Comment #1205539
Either this is bad journalism or the "architect" is really high. Because proposed re-architecture makes absolutely no sense. The article starts with an obvious observation, being t…