Viewing profile — xdarnold
xdarnold
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 30, 2011, 4:49 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 25
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About xdarnold
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #24328175
Your position is more or less defensible, but you will have to accept some compromises to your description of the universe that most physicists find untenable. Actually, it is Bell…
-
comment
Comment #22211092
I'm not making anecdotal conclusions or assumptions about whether people walk around or go into work, I'm simply stating the facts here based on considerable research. Influenza is…
-
comment
Comment #22210905
Of course in many ways they are different, but not in the important ones for this discussion. I used influenza because it was convenient in terms of available research, I could gra…
-
comment
Comment #22180320
Replying myself to add reference, here: https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(19)30354-6/pdf This is all well understood, and studied in considerable depth. The media overr…
-
comment
Comment #22179136
Over any time frame, it's still quite extreme. To use influenza as a proxy, which has virulence comparable to the cold, the yearly incidence rate in China is <35 per 100,000. Even …
-
comment
Comment #22169076
This is incorrect. If we assume that this virus is as infectious as the common cold, we can expect the infection rate within a household to be approximately 25% of contacts. That m…
-
comment
Comment #21199751
This is nothing more than the illusion of a stance so long as the statement on Weibo stands. Publicly calling Morey's statement "inappropriate" and "disappoint[ing]" and expressing…
-
comment
Comment #20512816
> Decoherence is a superposition effect, is it not? Entanglement with the environment, i.e. a superposition of system-environment states. The point I'm trying to make is that "spli…
-
comment
Comment #20499830
All depends on the context. Does it make sense to talk about propagating splitting in this context? Surely no - for three reasons: 1. You're describing a time evolution _of the sub…
-
comment
Comment #20492251
When we talk about MWI as the asker is trying to more fully understand, we are explicitly not talking about subsystems. There's just the one big evolving state (of the universe).
-
comment
Comment #20492220
Your choice of the future here is arbitrary - we could just as easily say that there are many past and present "you" in the multiverse. This assumes a definition closer to DD/DW's …
-
comment
Comment #20491095
"Splitting" does not propagate, or happen with any locality - it's the wave function of the entire universe doing the splitting, so there's nowhere for it to propagate!
-
comment
Comment #20491002
Your objections seem to me to arise straightforwardly from a disconnect over the definition of "you". Taking DW's position, and your axiom of unique self, I can resolve the issue b…
-
comment
Comment #11085045
With today's technology, for some compounds... you can count atoms by physical measurements and known structure, and figure mass by atomic weight. http://www.nist.gov/pml/si-redef/…
-
comment
Comment #7860037
This is potentially an interesting effect and worthy of some consideration, but the analysis needs to include some regression of this possible factor: An increased number of errors…
-
comment
Comment #7316085
I don't think I'm understanding your point. Why would they need to invalidate previously confirmed transaction?
-
comment
Comment #7314564
Why is this? My understanding of the way the network operates is that a group with 51% of hashing power can essentially arbitrarily manipulate the blockchain going forward. Nothing…
-
comment
Comment #7301900
100% agreed - this would certainly undermine the movement. The open question is whether it would do so more or less than the loss of half a billion dollars held by the community. I…
-
comment
Comment #7300808
I'm not making that assumption - rather the opposite, which is why I mentioned the possibility of reimbursing people later. But this isn't strictly necessary. Pragmatically, you co…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #7300681
I don't think this is what I'm suggesting at all. If a popular majority of miners agreed to accept transactions double spending the original coins, this would be tantamount to gene…
-
comment
Comment #7300472
It seems like there is a straightforward enough principle in this case to do so without much argument. Not that the method would be perfect. But isn't it preferable to the alternat…
-
comment
Comment #7300352
Under the presumption that it is true that ~750k BTC has been stolen, has anyone considered the possibility of orchestrating a 51% attack on the attacker(s)? Gox probably has logs …
-
comment
Comment #6643731
Or even, non-locomotive travel, as it were. In the relativistic sense. No discussion about interstellar travel can proceed without considering the Alcubierre drive. http://en.wikip…