Viewing profile — wthomp
wthomp
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Dec 28, 2018, 10:27 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 247
- Public activity
- 26 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About wthomp
meet.hn/city/48.4283182,-123.364953/Victoria
Socials: - bsky.app/profile/wrtastro
---
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42158456
This is maybe not the place, but we did some apples to apples comparisons between PyMC, Dynesty, and the Julia Turing.jl package. A little to my surprise, despite being a Julia fan…
-
comment
Comment #40570511
I visited the Large binocular telescope just a month or two ago. A very impressive facility, and one can only imagine the image quality if they were captured using both mirrors coh…
-
comment
Comment #38728293
That doesn’t seem to match what I understood from the article. At one point they say explicitly that it will enable brighter displays.
-
comment
Comment #38400634
My understanding is that the AO system for GMT is going to pose quite a challenge. A big topic of ongoing research is dealing with “petaling” where the separate primary mirrors in …
-
comment
Comment #38400414
There’s a bit more to it than that. GMT is further along but its design has many compromises versus TMT. Also, a second ELT in the southern hemisphere is less useful than one in bo…
-
comment
Comment #37294479
Worth mentioning that essentially all professional astronomers / astrophysicists consider this person a grifter. It’s amazing that he keeps getting so much press though, would love…
-
comment
Comment #37036662
Yes exactly. Which means it's extremely, extremely low. Even though the probably of a meteorite hitting somewhere is high, the probability of hitting somewhere in particular is tin…
-
comment
Comment #37001203
I’m using this from Julia and both the user and developer experience is great. It’s much more limited than publication style plotting libraries but the instant 60fps reactivity is …
-
comment
Comment #36975330
#3 spot at atmospheric pressure
-
comment
Comment #36588197
Coming from matplotlib, I found Makie such a breath of fresh air. The API is just as (if not more) flexible but way more predictable. Their layout system in particular is amazing. …
-
comment
Comment #36526301
As has been pointed out elsewhere, this is the first image of our galaxy in something other than light (radio, infrared, x rays, gamma rays are all photons).
-
comment
Comment #36490051
Would you mind explaining this further? Since sound is literally pressure waves, I don't understand how reducing sound can still leave "sound pressure".
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34617921
This is not a “nature publication” in the common sense. It’s in their commentary section.
-
comment
Comment #32342866
This is true but the poster above doesn’t mean Monte Carlo integration. Rather, testing those methods on simulations from generative models.
-
comment
Comment #32074063
Small correction, no one will be able to pay for time on JWST. But if you put in a proposal for time and it's accepted, they will pay you . That's to make sure there is sufficient …
-
comment
Comment #32074025
If you were to fly into these nebula in some kind of spaceship they wouldn't be any brighter than they appear in the night sky from Earth. They would just look way way bigger. The …
-
comment
Comment #31482496
This is really impressive, and a great write up. I’ve been following the work on static compiling Julia to x86 libraries from the GPUCompiler.jl folks but I didn’t expect to see Ju…
-
comment
Comment #31361349
As others have mentioned, this is similar to how the event horizon telescope works today! However, there’s no free lunch. By using arrays of telescopes instead of a single filled d…
-
comment
Comment #31361310
No, unfortunately those measurements have to be taken at the same time. That said, as the Earth rotates the distance between any two pairs of antennas changes which can be used to …
-
comment
Comment #31354987
For those wondering if we could get sharper images with JWST, here’s the previously imaged black hole (same angular size as our own) compared to a single pixel from Hubble’s wide f…
-
comment
Comment #31353990
Unfortunately JWST won’t come close to being able to resolve Sgr A*. They measured its diameter in micro-arcseconds, whereas JWST’s limiting resolution will be measured in 10s-100s…
-
comment
Comment #29895044
For mercury, the L1 and L2 points would be closer to the planet.
-
comment
Comment #28233959
Many circumstellar disks have been detected, but this is the first unambiguous detection of a circumplanetary disk. This is believed to be material swirling around a protoplanet, a…
-
comment
Comment #27764841
The diffraction limit is the fundamental resolution limit of a telescope. This is the size of "spot" that will be created on the camera sensor for a single point of light like a st…