Viewing profile — wsdookadr

Just invest more in AI and datacenters. Problem solved.

For what reason

People who rely on maps would have them downloaded onto their navigation devices. Nobody needs Garmin to be up 100% of the time.

There are no roles of that kind. If you want to work in IT, you need to be a recruiter or a manager. While this might seem controversial, it's very accurate.

excellent idea!

it's clear. nobody needs more than 5GB. they won't exist if they need more and this ensures the statement is true. maybe this is a trend and should be used for all websites. make s…

NAS with lots of storage + tubesync + jellyfin. problem solved.

99.999999999999999999999999% high availability fault tolerant and resilient infrastructure

[flagged]

Possibly the most important tech project of 2024.

Does anyone else notice that this comment is offtopic and beside the point?

There's actual SWE jobs where humans sift through this kind of noise. Someone told me they worked such a job recently. It's a good tool to add pressure and raise expectations. Mayb…

What makes you say it's not representative?

at the time of writing this their repo is 12h old. the training time isn't stated in the paper. i'm thinking maybe one of these robots can replicate this and tell us how it went.

boots up real fast https://www.youtube.com/shorts/TEa-M6_qUII

There is no evidence that anyone actually needs FB/IG/Threads. If tommorow Meta shuts down and the entirety of its assets, all the money, all the infrastructure and the people get …

> In the case of a woman who has a fully developed muscular system and has had ample physical exertion all through the preg nancy, as is common with all more primitive peoples, nat…

reported the bug here https://github.com/sympy/sympy/issues/25507

I'd say IRC and Matrix are the only viable protocols. The rest are just proprietary, centralized, corporate-owned. Here's a short list of those: Teams, Zoom, Discord, Whatsapp, Tel…

That an algorithm is heuristic does not preclude it from being provably correct. It precludes it from being optimal! The goal of an heuristic algorithm is to produce a near-optimal…

It's fine if you want to refer to Kahneman's classification [1] of instinctual and thorough thinking. Explainability is a separate topic. Also when the amount of energy and compute…

This isn't a question of taste. The topic can't be trivialized to a choice between apples and oranges. I actually reject your entire last message.

It's unreasonable to give up on explanations and deem something "not understandable" when we've been doing this thing for 3000+ years called mathematics, where it's exactly explain…