Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — worksonmymach

worksonmymach

HN member
Joined
Sat, Nov 30, 2024, 2:27 AM UTC
HN karma
47
Public activity
39 items

About worksonmymach

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #42346139

    Do I need to pay to see that? It is confusing. Anyway yes calculator apps are a fantastic project: 1. Can be anything from just running a lisp repl and doing (+ 2 2) to a full blow…

  2. comment
    Comment #42346061

    What are the inconsistencies? None of these tools will be perfect. They don't have backend access to Google's servers. It is all approximate because the long tail is stuff like "bu…

  3. comment
    Comment #42337903

    I'd say Atlassian is good at least in AU not sure about US. You have to work the 40 but thats it. I do more than 40 because I enjoy but no pressure. Also Team Anywhere and as long …

  4. comment
    Comment #42336947

    Back in the day (2000s) if you were a .NET shop it made sense as the providers for anything else were not as good. And probably you are more likely to get those skills over Postgre…

  5. comment
    Comment #42333797

    SQL Server and Oracle too but not being open source is a big minus.

  6. comment
    Comment #42327613

    Or thanks follow the sun sres

  7. comment
    Comment #42327602

    TIL! I'd love a 1.1.1.4 (plus adblocker) and 1.1.1.5 (plus adblocker plus social media blocker)

  8. comment
    Comment #42316387

    Dont pay $20, use the API and pay $2 or less :)

  9. comment
    Comment #42315503

    You are right and the biggest asset here are executives and management that can: 1. Think 2. Know what is going on. 3. Effectively get the best from their people. You want the whol…

  10. comment
    Comment #42315467

    > If a competitor launches a feature that all your customers want and start to switch to benefit from it, what are you going to do? I would say this is not that common in SaaS. In …

  11. comment
    Comment #42313562

    I like this metric. YC doesn't own all of that but that doesn't matter for this exercise. That $458 billion is disjointed. It cannot move as one (when needed) like say Microsoft ca…

  12. comment
    Comment #42313548

    I think it massive improves your odds of a unicorn. But a regular old business aiming for a humble $10m valuation based on profits, of course not.

  13. comment
    Comment #42313525

    Sure I'd rather have $1m in FAANG shares than SF real estate over 10 years but maybe I am wrong. Especially as SF real estate relies on NIMBYism that might change whereas FAANG rel…

  14. comment
    Comment #42313513

    It needs a culture change. The magic words: "Our customers prefer the product works over getting a new feature, so let's ensure that at any cost" Number of features is a dial. You …

  15. comment
    Comment #42313456

    Taking ownership is very much egoless! You are doing that for the team. Ego would be making sure you got "your" sprint tickets done, did no code reviews, skipped the retro. I think…

  16. comment
    Comment #42305359

    That is what makes it very interesting! I think you have said not interesting when you may have meant explainable. If it is boring, who else does this?

  17. comment
    Comment #42305323

    If I met a 8 holed donut I'd tear it a new one.

  18. comment
    Comment #42305078

    It is critique not advice.

  19. comment
    Comment #42304694

    It is legendary. Trying to think is anything else like it? Freemasons? Hells angels? Donald Trump's cabinet?! Does YC do this consistently though. Even they have to choose battles.…

  20. comment
    Comment #42304567

    I'd love to know who "wins" in a scaled YC vs. the oceanic tide that is the SP500 and it's capital sucking and brain sucking ways. A Google can stop 10000 potential startups simply…

  21. comment
    Comment #42304551

    Commoncog hits a home run again. This is fascinating. It is more Suits than Suits. Showing how strategy > law when fighting a case. But also the interesting fraternity (not all boy…

  22. comment
    Comment #42304414

    It can look nice. It is like asking: passive or active voice? It depends what you are writing and what makes sense to the reader. I do like pipelines though!

  23. comment
    Comment #42303812

    1. Change . to | 2. Reverse Now you have: words | map read | sum Or.. $ cat words | map -e read | sum

  24. comment
    Comment #42303715

    Oh sir we call that "operational semantics"

  25. comment
    Comment #42303700

    To understand "do" you need to understand the underlying >>= and return operators for your monad. If you can use >>= and return to do it then "do" is indeed a mechanical transforma…