Viewing profile — worksonmymach
worksonmymach
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Nov 30, 2024, 2:27 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 47
- Public activity
- 39 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About worksonmymach
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #42346139
Do I need to pay to see that? It is confusing. Anyway yes calculator apps are a fantastic project: 1. Can be anything from just running a lisp repl and doing (+ 2 2) to a full blow…
-
comment
Comment #42346061
What are the inconsistencies? None of these tools will be perfect. They don't have backend access to Google's servers. It is all approximate because the long tail is stuff like "bu…
-
comment
Comment #42337903
I'd say Atlassian is good at least in AU not sure about US. You have to work the 40 but thats it. I do more than 40 because I enjoy but no pressure. Also Team Anywhere and as long …
-
comment
Comment #42336947
Back in the day (2000s) if you were a .NET shop it made sense as the providers for anything else were not as good. And probably you are more likely to get those skills over Postgre…
-
comment
Comment #42333797
SQL Server and Oracle too but not being open source is a big minus.
-
comment
Comment #42327613
Or thanks follow the sun sres
-
comment
Comment #42327602
TIL! I'd love a 1.1.1.4 (plus adblocker) and 1.1.1.5 (plus adblocker plus social media blocker)
-
comment
Comment #42316387
Dont pay $20, use the API and pay $2 or less :)
-
comment
Comment #42315503
You are right and the biggest asset here are executives and management that can: 1. Think 2. Know what is going on. 3. Effectively get the best from their people. You want the whol…
-
comment
Comment #42315467
> If a competitor launches a feature that all your customers want and start to switch to benefit from it, what are you going to do? I would say this is not that common in SaaS. In …
-
comment
Comment #42313562
I like this metric. YC doesn't own all of that but that doesn't matter for this exercise. That $458 billion is disjointed. It cannot move as one (when needed) like say Microsoft ca…
-
comment
Comment #42313548
I think it massive improves your odds of a unicorn. But a regular old business aiming for a humble $10m valuation based on profits, of course not.
-
comment
Comment #42313525
Sure I'd rather have $1m in FAANG shares than SF real estate over 10 years but maybe I am wrong. Especially as SF real estate relies on NIMBYism that might change whereas FAANG rel…
-
comment
Comment #42313513
It needs a culture change. The magic words: "Our customers prefer the product works over getting a new feature, so let's ensure that at any cost" Number of features is a dial. You …
-
comment
Comment #42313456
Taking ownership is very much egoless! You are doing that for the team. Ego would be making sure you got "your" sprint tickets done, did no code reviews, skipped the retro. I think…
-
comment
Comment #42305359
That is what makes it very interesting! I think you have said not interesting when you may have meant explainable. If it is boring, who else does this?
-
comment
Comment #42305323
If I met a 8 holed donut I'd tear it a new one.
-
comment
Comment #42305078
It is critique not advice.
-
comment
Comment #42304694
It is legendary. Trying to think is anything else like it? Freemasons? Hells angels? Donald Trump's cabinet?! Does YC do this consistently though. Even they have to choose battles.…
-
comment
Comment #42304567
I'd love to know who "wins" in a scaled YC vs. the oceanic tide that is the SP500 and it's capital sucking and brain sucking ways. A Google can stop 10000 potential startups simply…
-
comment
Comment #42304551
Commoncog hits a home run again. This is fascinating. It is more Suits than Suits. Showing how strategy > law when fighting a case. But also the interesting fraternity (not all boy…
-
comment
Comment #42304414
It can look nice. It is like asking: passive or active voice? It depends what you are writing and what makes sense to the reader. I do like pipelines though!
-
comment
Comment #42303812
1. Change . to | 2. Reverse Now you have: words | map read | sum Or.. $ cat words | map -e read | sum
-
comment
Comment #42303715
Oh sir we call that "operational semantics"
-
comment
Comment #42303700
To understand "do" you need to understand the underlying >>= and return operators for your monad. If you can use >>= and return to do it then "do" is indeed a mechanical transforma…