Viewing profile — wnoise
wnoise
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Sep 04, 2010, 7:59 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,837
- Public activity
- 1,157 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About wnoise
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49000245
Don't forget pizza delivery.
-
comment
Comment #48569607
Saying your quoted words is a request for someone to read and respond; it's still pressure and a burden.
-
comment
Comment #48569497
This is significant semantic drift from the original meaning of yak shaving. Building your own is great, but it's not yak shaving. Yak shaving is fixing fractal brokenness that you…
-
comment
Comment #47942778
More commonly, edit them.
-
comment
Comment #47942656
General Relativity was published in 1916.
-
comment
Comment #47630659
You don't want the people that run the engineering firms, no. You might want some of the people that work there.
-
comment
Comment #47448642
I knew that about the feds, but does it also apply to the states?
-
comment
Comment #47448310
Even though you would think that'd be a taking for public use.
-
comment
Comment #47371808
Because those are far more general than what he is asking for, and what he is asking for will usually not be seen as covered by your generalization.
-
comment
Comment #47361490
To be clear, "Apple" is a group, not a unified thing with one will. That doesn't mean that the engineeers will necessarily ship something more flexible than what the PMs asked for.…
-
comment
Comment #46082476
The commissioners?
-
comment
Comment #45509856
That's for Charlie Kirk et al, not Jesse Singal.
-
comment
Comment #45153261
They didn't. Pure lambda calculus would have been "a function that when applied to a number encoded as a function, extracts that value". They did it essentially as a linked list, C…
-
comment
Comment #45152887
They are quite related, but the Fourier transform seems far more beautiful and generalizable: you can do 2-d, 3-d, etc transforms, and they automatically respect the symmetries of …
-
comment
Comment #45152201
No, humans can't inspect their own weights either -- but we're not LLMs and don't store all knowledge implicitly as probabilities to output next token. It's pretty clear that we al…
-
comment
Comment #44901210
Topics? No, I don't agree with that. Almost any subject can be treated in an age-appropriate manner. A 7-year-old doesn't need to read about nearly any topic. Excluding any mention…
-
comment
Comment #44806928
And what dynamic libraries s it linked to? And what other data are they pulling in?
-
comment
Comment #44588038
The idea of pathological RAM access patterns is as ridiculous as the idea of pathological division of floating point numbers. ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pentium_FDIV_bug ). Th…
-
comment
Comment #44401516
They cannot. It requires a simple majority in the House followed by a 2/3 majority in the Senate. This is basically impossible to achieve.
-
comment
Comment #44401487
They do not create binding precedent. They can create so-called persuasive precedent -- something other courts (and the same district in subsequent opinions) can and do cite when t…
-
comment
Comment #43746214
Because no one made it illegal?
-
comment
Comment #43686101
I think I agree nearly 100% with this. The tricky part is always selective-enforcement: > But if you criticize only Israel about some issue, and grant a free pass to everyone else …
-
comment
Comment #43685963
If that standard were universally applied, even purely defensive wars could not be done.
-
comment
Comment #43685888
Unless you're speaking about the high overhead rates, that's really the wrong framing. The public funds at issue are buying things like research, or hospital services.
-
comment
Comment #43685866
Depends on what you mean by anti-Zionism. It's not a natural congregation point -- even those that don't think Israel should exist don't generally call themselves anti-Zionist. As …