Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — withoutboats2

withoutboats2

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 10, 2021, 11:36 AM UTC
HN karma
498
Public activity
19 items

About withoutboats2

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #33577268

    > That single passing reference to him as King of Assyria, was everything that was known of him for 2500 years, until the ruins of Dur-Sharrukin, his capital (destroyed during the …

  2. comment
    Comment #33512918

    Before writing a completely asinine comment like this, you might consider that I, having been paid real American dollars to design this language, might know more than you about the…

  3. comment
    Comment #33508568

    You're begging the question when you say that GATs are "not comprehensible for a mortal like myself." My entire point is that they were designed not to be incomprehensible. What is…

  4. comment
    Comment #33506540

    I hope you don't. To establish my credentials for this comment - GATs were my idea. The entire point of GATs was to carve out a design space that solved peoples' problems without b…

  5. comment
    Comment #31612858

    That's not why I stopped working on Rust. Given that Amazon, Google, Microsoft and others all employ people to work on Rust, lack of money is certainly not the problem. There has n…

  6. comment
    Comment #31606603

    > Async support is incredibly half-baked. It was released as an MVP, but that MVP has not improved notably in almost three years. As the primary mover of the MVP (who stopped worki…

  7. comment
    Comment #26539037

    Java's NPE is not at all the same thing as the undefined behavior of dereferencing a null pointer in C (or Zig in release mode). In fact its the same exact thing as calling unwrap.…

  8. comment
    Comment #26538988

    This is the opposite of reality: in Rust, the safe syntax `?` exists and there is no short syntax for the panicking form (`.unwrap()`). Users are not incentivized to unwrap in Rust…

  9. comment
    Comment #26512550

    It is not at all like Rust; it is a garbage collection system based on reference counting, pretty similar to Swift. This is obscured by the documentation for each using similar ter…

  10. comment
    Comment #26512270

    I hope your book does well.

  11. comment
    Comment #26512236

    It doesn't really matter to me what you, an internet stranger, are "excited to consider as something you want to work with." Instead, what you should consider is how incredibly boo…

  12. comment
    Comment #26511350

    As others have written, there's basically no connection between Rust's six week release cycle & the rate of actual change to Rust. If Rust switched to a 12 week release cycle, all …

  13. comment
    Comment #26422158

    > But then, in a typical use of select, you don't actually want to cancel the I/O operations represented by the other futures. Rather, you're running select in a loop in order to h…

  14. comment
    Comment #26412822

    Of course I was more gracious to pornel - that remark was uncharacteristically flippant from a contributor who is normally thoughtful and constructive. pornel is not in the habit o…

  15. comment
    Comment #26411103

    That is not a correct reading of the situation. async/await was not rushed, and does not have flaws that could have been solved with more time. async/await will continue to improve…

  16. comment
    Comment #26410783

    https://aturon.github.io/blog/2016/09/07/futures-design/ The completion based futures that Alex started with were also based on epoll. The performance issues it presented had nothi…

  17. comment
    Comment #26410614

    > I am not sure whether this is actually viable. Having investigated this myself, I would be very surprised to discover that it is. The only viable solution to make AsyncRead zero …

  18. comment
    Comment #26410565

    Alex Crichton started with a completion based Future struct in 2015. It was even (unstable) in std in 1.0.0: https://doc.rust-lang.org/1.0.0/std/sync/struct.Future.html Our async I…

  19. comment
    Comment #26410487

    This post is completely and totally wrong. At least you got to ruin my day, I hope that's a consolation prize for you. There is NO meaningful connection between the completion vs p…