Viewing profile — winwang

I decided to ask chatgpt for a fermi estimate of cores/datacenter, which you can check for yourself: 1~10 million physical cores. The surprising part of this for me was the "low" p…

Back of the envelope math, if anyone wants to correct my mental model: 2.1B (min core)/week ~ 300M (min core)/day. Assuming ~300k cores (~3k physical server CPUs, seems fine), that…

I don't GR but I'm fairly certain dipole does not work for gravitational waves (i.e. two objects accelerating straight at each other). Supposedly, there's a specific definition of …

Wouldn't discretion "just" be a really good rules engine?

I used Claude to generate technical SVGs (which are verifiable correct) because I wasn't going to take the time to draw the grid/arrows/etc.

... I don't think the original commenter said anything about mice being a non-model organism. But mice are far from humans, and I, at least, find the distinction rather important.

This is a big part of why I am in love in Posthog's design (though personally I have little belief in my own current ability to replicate it)

Almost completely disagree. Slightly more expensive, but significant better on a per-prompt basis? For non-trivial projects, the former is a small linear increase, the latter is a …

I found 4.6 more amenable than 4.8 to style directions, we'll see how 5.0 does. Super-small-sample-size: I think part of its "Claude-ism" style comes from its propensity to try and…

Several other commenters have disparaging the design seemingly mostly due to its AI-generated nature, or maybe they actually do dislike cyberpunk. Personally, I think being able to…

> This isn't a real product. The most disappointing part q_q

How bad is it for you? Are you on ultra or xhigh/max? I typically ask it (5.5, now 5.6-sol) to use subagents for specific things anyway. On the Pro 20x plan, I'm seeing like ~1% us…

I find it interesting that no one here has mentioned the increased (usable) context window 258k -> 353k. That's huge, but I wonder if it means we pay long context (2x) for the ones…

I would pay $200/mo for Opus 4.8 already. Fable 5 is just a cherry on top (although, without it, Codex 5.5 is the better buy imo).

Honestly quite excited to see what can happen here, I think biology has generally had a lack of data science expertise.

(Yes, not yet, but...) As a Scala afficionado, "free"/freer runtime performance is very welcome :) Fun read.

(Based off 2-3 month-old recollection, take with a grain of salt) I had wanted to use it for my agent "network". A2A didn't fit the use case of "trusted agent, and was bloated due …

Not saying you're doing this specifically, but I'd be careful with thinking that "company" in China means the same as "company" in America (or in the West more generally).

Love this. I've shifted in the past few months to using highly expressive types in Scala 3 to have types carry more and more compile-time proofs (without macros, though a couple ar…

Minor note, 2x $/tok is not 2x cost. Personally, I see Fable being significantly more token-efficient than Opus 4.8. Then, there's also the compounding costs of quality.

My experience has been that 5.4 is slower than 5.5 (confound: I use >512k max context size for 5.4, though it seems slower even below the normal size)

I typically just launch CC with `--model claude-opus-4-6[1m]`, `4-6[1m]` -> `4-8[1m]` works fine. Still 200k max without the `[1m]`.

There's the other (orthogonal) possible explanation of using more GPUs for stress-testing before product launch.

How else would you write this (marketing copy) exactly? "Its output matches better to its CoT which matches to better to our hidden state decoder according to ; see "? ... Actually…