Viewing profile — winternewt
winternewt
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 15, 2015, 3:36 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 655
- Public activity
- 219 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About winternewt
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48685569
Capacity for inference isn't a cost issue, it's an availability issue. There just isn't enough hardware out there.
-
comment
Comment #48684477
From the article: > What is happening here is that leading AI labs are charging not only for inference but also for research in model architecture, training data collection and cur…
-
comment
Comment #47888817
> Adding an in-product tip to recommend running /clear when re-visiting old conversations (we shipped a few iterations of this) I feel like I'm missing something here. Why would I …
-
comment
Comment #47888206
Instead of just dropping all the context, the system could also run a compaction (summarizing the entire convo) before dropping it. Better to continue with a summary than to lose e…
-
comment
Comment #47499047
What version of Claude Code is this? I don't have the /cost command mentioned here.
-
comment
Comment #47252161
Unless the bubble bursts and tons of failing AI companies dump used graphics cards on the market.
-
comment
Comment #47192229
And if you don't want to buy a Mac? A 80 GB NVidia GPU costs $10,000K (equivalent to 30 years of ChatGPT Plus subscription) and will probably be obsolete in 5-7 years anyway. What …
-
comment
Comment #46744781
No need to speculate. The article was published in 2019 and the movie is now six years old.
-
comment
Comment #46731661
When I was a kid reading Marvel comics, Spiderman seemed like a bad and relatively uninteresting super hero. His problems were trivial personal issues and he rarely left NYC, fight…
-
comment
Comment #46552810
The use case I always envisioned from the sidelines was that I could ditch a poorly designed, garbage-collected mess of a language (JavaScript) for something typesafe, with predict…
-
comment
Comment #46411961
You are allowed to throw from a destructor as long as there's not already an active exception unwinding the stack. In my experience this is a total non-issue for any real-world sce…
-
comment
Comment #46410467
Destructors are vastly superior to the finally keyword because they only require us to remember a single time to release resources (in the destructor) as opposed to every finally c…
-
comment
Comment #46364343
That's not a feature that the developer has control over. All they can do is try to develop a good tool.
-
comment
Comment #46202075
The worst part about MS Office isn't the direct user experience, because I can usually choose to use other software. The worst part is that I and everybody else are subjected to th…
-
comment
Comment #46159895
What are you implying by linking to that article?
-
comment
Comment #46056206
You're not explaining why the trifecta doesn't solve the problem. What attack vector remains?
-
comment
Comment #45863730
I see where you're coming from. But I often find that when I have some idea or challenge that I want to solve, I get bogged down in details (like how do I build that project)... be…
-
comment
Comment #45556873
You misunderstand my point. I'm not saying that the purpose of Hermès is to sell bags. I'm saying that the _product_ that Hermès sells is status, and the product of a restaurant is…
-
comment
Comment #45555919
Maybe not slower once it has warmed up, though for memory-bandwidth bound use cases I would still say the lack of mutable records has you fighting the language to get reasonable ca…
-
comment
Comment #45536886
The article got off on the wrong foot from the start by separating the purpose from the product. To my mind the purpose is the product and always will be.
-
comment
Comment #45530214
It's actionable if you have some imagination. Raise funds for a nonprofit. Start lobbying on both sides of the aisle. Enlist an advertising company to show the dystopian future if …
-
comment
Comment #45519689
Promote a better constitution that protects people from laws like this?
-
comment
Comment #45402830
I think we already ticked that box
-
comment
Comment #45393946
Humans and LLMs are deterministic in the sense that if you would rewind the universe, everything would happen the same way again. But both humans and LLMs have hidden variables tha…
-
comment
Comment #45384713
I thought it was "there's no position in chess that requires more than 218 moves to reach."