Viewing profile — winstonewert
winstonewert
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jul 08, 2015, 5:58 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 950
- Public activity
- 461 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About winstonewert
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47730192
For anyone who might be confused about the pardoning a turkey reference: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_Thanksgiving_Turkey_P...
- story
-
comment
Comment #46351356
Perhaps you could refrain from slandering Rust proponents without any evidence.
-
comment
Comment #45987292
I think the real question has to be: how do we determine what the regulations should be. Today, regulations are typically the product of dysfunctional political processes, and, no …
-
comment
Comment #45837803
> but not everything is necessarily backed by the same kind of heap-allocated memory object. Do you have an example, I thought literally everything in Python did trace to a PyObjec…
-
comment
Comment #44712944
The problem is that sometimes it is not a necessary condition. Rather, the tests might have been checking implementation details or just been wrong in the first place. Now, when te…
-
comment
Comment #44599645
Some thoughts: - It says that 3/4 of people kept working; to me, that seems like a big drop. - Data is based on a survey of people in the program; I distrust data from surveys on p…
-
comment
Comment #44589558
There is likely a cost to the infrastructure necessary to enable calling 911 that scales with the number of users not the number of 911 calls. Where I'm at, there is a 75 cent per …
-
comment
Comment #44587484
Then I'm sure you're willing to donate the cash to make it happen.
- story
-
comment
Comment #43853594
Perhaps - but they could just do what Microsoft did: bundle a version of Chromium.
-
comment
Comment #43551558
It sounds to me like you are thinking something like: if they use XML, they'll have a well defined schema and will follow standardized XML types. But if they use JSON they may not …
-
comment
Comment #43519245
My specific claim was that you could represent it in JSON, so you can't claim, as the post I responded to did, that JSON "cannot be used." I'll fully grant, I don't want to write a…
-
comment
Comment #43515540
I think I can see something of where you're coming from. But a question: You complain about dates in JSON (really a specific case of parsing text in JSON): > If they implement date…
-
comment
Comment #43515359
`{ type: "p", children: [{type: "text", text: "How would you represent "}, {type: "b", children: [{type: "i", children: [{type: "text", text: "mixed content"}]], {type: "text", tex…
-
comment
Comment #43512779
What actually prevents JSON from being used in these spaces? It seems to me that any XML structure can be represented in JSON. Personally, I've yet to come across an XML document I…
-
comment
Comment #43093827
Really? Is there no level of compensation that would make you think that getting punched was worthwhile?
-
comment
Comment #42925189
Well, if they did that, then people could expect/demand stability with regard to what scenarios get the checks/panics optimized out. This would be a bit of a burden for the Rust ma…
-
comment
Comment #42421821
But the great thing about Rust is that the panic traces back to the exact place where I thought something couldn't be None, but it was. In Java, I frequently found it mysterious wh…
-
comment
Comment #40837764
I think the causation runs in the opposite direction. These exceptions for these platforms were implemented in an inefficient fashion BECAUSE they thought that exceptions should al…
-
comment
Comment #40835296
My wish: people stop using the dumb line that exceptions are gotos.
-
comment
Comment #40702455
To attempt a more measured response: given that the NRLB hasn't gotten involved in any company with this policy that's clearly not true.
-
comment
Comment #40702426
I'm sorry for my earlier responses. I was becoming ill, didn't realize it, and that messes with my temper. One day I'll learn not to argue with people on the internet when that hap…
-
comment
Comment #40699493
The difference is that me and others have repeatedly explained why you are wrong in this thread, and you keep repeating the same nonsense assertions.
-
comment
Comment #40698267
You are wrong. Since you show no signs of recognizing that, or providing any reason to back up your assertions, I'm done with this conversation.