Viewing profile — will_hughes
will_hughes
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 13, 2012, 12:08 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,038
- Public activity
- 316 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About will_hughes
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20333926
Location: Sydney, Australia Remote: Yes, preferably (I have a quiet home office and 100Mbit+ FTTH internet) Willing to relocate: No Technologies: C#/.NET, Powershell, Windows, Linu…
-
comment
Comment #20084901
Location: Sydney, Australia Remote: Yes, preferably (I have a quiet home office and 100Mbit+ FTTH internet) Willing to relocate: Maybe, within AU/NZ - lets talk. Technologies: C#/.…
-
comment
Comment #19896487
Location: Sydney, Australia Remote: Yes, preferably - at least part of the time (I have a quiet home office and 100Mbit+ FTTH internet) Willing to relocate: Maybe, within AU/NZ - l…
-
comment
Comment #16491408
> Well clearly I didn't try hard enough Well, I had the advantage in that I already knew I wasn't touching it on Docker with a ten foot pole, and we use Ansible, so that made my go…
-
comment
Comment #16490563
>Yeah so has anyone actually tried to get ElasticSearch up and running lately? Actually, yes. I just finished doing our migration from ELK 1.7 to 6.1.3. We're using installs direct…
-
comment
Comment #16381643
The one thing I miss about working for a major national telco was access to the internal newsgroups where you'd get deep discussions triggered by someone's random question on thing…
-
comment
Comment #16337999
Probably because they support older SSL/TLS versions and/or cryptographic ciphers.
-
comment
Comment #16253900
The first quoted instance is still apparently an ongoing case[1] as of this month, so it's not exactly settled. [1] http://www.bcdemocrat.com/2018/01/04/former-abbey-inn-owner-...
-
comment
Comment #16200072
> will just report you to the cops if they see sleight-of-hand Why? Just add it to the order.
-
comment
Comment #16132252
Wrong thread? Also, it may be true where you are, but it's not universally true. I know the cycle and timing of the lights near my home, and I keep getting frustrated by people who…
-
comment
Comment #16132233
> I think they should only retaliate on US officials (elected and who work for DHS). Ask them to reveal passwords to national secrets when they enter the country, then detain them …
-
comment
Comment #16132192
> what's the problem with the HTTP-01 challenge? Nothing, yet. But who's to say that another similar bug won't be found in common shared-hosting platforms that forces LE to turn th…
-
comment
Comment #16132164
This is already covered in the book. The water ice on Ceres had already been used up in the colonisation efforts of Earth and then later: Mars.
-
comment
Comment #16130931
> Nothing says I control the domain like the ability to add and remove data from the authoritative DNS servers for the domain label (and children thereof) in question. Unfortunatel…
-
comment
Comment #16095224
You're going to find it a hard road to convince anyone that ISPs shouldn't be able to perform standard network management activities on their network. It's also extremely unhelpful…
-
comment
Comment #16094642
> With Australia, submarine transport costs to Singapore (nearest 'major' Internet hub) There's very little direct bandwidth to Singapore - there's only one cable going west (SEA-M…
-
comment
Comment #16094138
> Under the net neutrality definition linked above, blocking specific ports is a clear violation. I don't see how you can read that from the linked wikipedia page. I assume you're …
-
comment
Comment #16094060
Are you talking about the Binge-On service[1]? That's an optional service on both the customer and provider side. Either way, there's no additional charges on the customer or provi…
-
comment
Comment #16093896
The argument for prohibiting zero-rating under NN generally goes like this: If provider X provides a very limited (or no) quota for regular internet traffic, and provides access to…
-
comment
Comment #16093801
Net Neutrality doesn't prevent network operators from stopping malicious activity on their network. Blocking Port 25 to specific providers unless they pay up would be a problem, bu…
-
comment
Comment #16093357
> does not prevent Comcast, At&t, Verizon et al. from blocking port 25 as they have been for the past decade Are you really that suprised they block it? It's an exceedingly effecti…
-
comment
Comment #16044940
>Another HN user who actually works for Telstra saw my post above and reached out to me via email to try and reach a resolution Good to hear. Checking your profile seems you're rur…
-
comment
Comment #16044913
Telstra is the current product of a hundred years of monopolistic government owned telco. They were forced into competition through providing wholesale access to the copper network…
-
comment
Comment #16044602
They're trained to keep the peace. 'Measured', I don't know about. I can imagine they're personally motivated to try and resolve things without resorting to arresting someone as th…
-
comment
Comment #16044572
> First thing in 2008 Hello time traveller. While you're at it, buy/mine Bitcoin. It seems crazy, don't worry - it doesn't get any less so. Sell it Mid December 2017. Also, if you'…