Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — whyever

whyever

HN member
Joined
Sat, Mar 08, 2014, 8:29 PM UTC
HN karma
973
Public activity
463 items

About whyever

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48178130

    There was Quelle, Europe's largest mail-order and retail company. They were excited about mailing their catalogue on CD-ROM, but slept on the Internet. In 2009, they went bankrupt.…

  2. comment
    Comment #47772321

    LLMs are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, so I'm not sure they are in advantage.

  3. comment
    Comment #45921956

    Note that N=1 for the memory safety vulnerabilities they had with Rust, so the error of the estimated average number of vulnerabilities per LOC is quite large.

  4. comment
    Comment #45789574

    It's missing which point?

  5. comment
    Comment #45752185

    I agree, but https://www.pcg-random.org/ still advertizes PCG as "challenging" to predict, and critizises other RNGs as predictable and insecure.

  6. comment
    Comment #45303027

    Yes, but this relation does but apply to statistical mechanics and statistical physics, they mean the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_mechanics What is included in …

  7. comment
    Comment #45301878

    They are synonyms.

  8. comment
    Comment #45182643

    Signal asks you to repeat the key immediately before even enabling backups. It cannot fail much later unless you modify the digit after the check.

  9. comment
    Comment #45125682

    That's a good question! Especially after Frank McSherry's COST paper [1], it's hard to imagine where the sweet spot for Spark is. I guess for Databricks it makes sense to push Spar…

  10. comment
    Comment #44981907

    It's a quantitative problem. How big is the error introduced by the simplification?

  11. comment
    Comment #44970210

    I know some people who do trunk-based development with pair programming: You write the code together, and once you are satisfied, you merge it to the main branch, from where it is …

  12. comment
    Comment #44938543

    It would require a lot more memory, because you have to remember every generated UUID. And how would you do the partial match? You are not going to observe any collisions.

  13. comment
    Comment #44938522

    Doesn't the clustering make collisions strictly more likely?

  14. comment
    Comment #44938510

    You can also look at the expected number of collisions instead, which is approximately the number of random numbers squared, divided by the size of the space of random numbers. The…

  15. comment
    Comment #44929602

    > With that access you can also "do" things, like sending messages or delete stuff. If you break E2E encryption, you can likely also impersonate and "do" things.

  16. comment
    Comment #44835342

    I know some conservative newspapers (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung) kept using the old orthography for a while, but even they started using the new one in 2007, ten years after th…

  17. comment
    Comment #44823290

    Yes, in this case it would be easier to brute-force the key instead of the password, so the additional characters don't really help.

  18. comment
    Comment #44821475

    Such long passwords are silly, they will be effectively truncated by the key length of the underlying cryptography.

  19. comment
    Comment #44682382

    That's not how errors add up, it's nonlinear. You have to take the sum of squares. So in your case, it wouldn't be 10 * 0.01 = 0.1, but sqrt(10 * 0.01^2) = 0.032, which is less tha…

  20. comment
    Comment #44617339

    I think the argument was about automated killing, not automated weapons. There are already drones from Germany capable of automatic target acquisition, but they still require a hum…

  21. comment
    Comment #44488744

    All the attacks you described also apply to downloading and executing a file. I don't think `curl | sh` is worse in this regard.

  22. comment
    Comment #44460501

    Ok, so how would such a secret end up in a commit? E.g., I don't see why I would have my home address anywhere close to a code repository. Maybe if I used the wrong "secret" email …

  23. comment
    Comment #44452835

    If you rotated the secret, why do anything else? I don't think there is any potential further damage (except maybe reputational).

  24. comment
    Comment #44307905

    > I mean, webp was made by Google and we know how many of their heavily promoted creations are dead already... I don't understand this argument. WebP is an algorithm, not a service…

  25. comment
    Comment #44179289

    Docker is not really a security boundary (unless you use something like gVisor), so it's a bit of a red herring here. The idea is to make your app immutable and store all state in …