Viewing profile — whyever
whyever
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Mar 08, 2014, 8:29 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 973
- Public activity
- 463 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About whyever
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48178130
There was Quelle, Europe's largest mail-order and retail company. They were excited about mailing their catalogue on CD-ROM, but slept on the Internet. In 2009, they went bankrupt.…
-
comment
Comment #47772321
LLMs are vulnerable to prompt injection attacks, so I'm not sure they are in advantage.
-
comment
Comment #45921956
Note that N=1 for the memory safety vulnerabilities they had with Rust, so the error of the estimated average number of vulnerabilities per LOC is quite large.
-
comment
Comment #45789574
It's missing which point?
-
comment
Comment #45752185
I agree, but https://www.pcg-random.org/ still advertizes PCG as "challenging" to predict, and critizises other RNGs as predictable and insecure.
-
comment
Comment #45303027
Yes, but this relation does but apply to statistical mechanics and statistical physics, they mean the same: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statistical_mechanics What is included in …
-
comment
Comment #45301878
They are synonyms.
-
comment
Comment #45182643
Signal asks you to repeat the key immediately before even enabling backups. It cannot fail much later unless you modify the digit after the check.
-
comment
Comment #45125682
That's a good question! Especially after Frank McSherry's COST paper [1], it's hard to imagine where the sweet spot for Spark is. I guess for Databricks it makes sense to push Spar…
-
comment
Comment #44981907
It's a quantitative problem. How big is the error introduced by the simplification?
-
comment
Comment #44970210
I know some people who do trunk-based development with pair programming: You write the code together, and once you are satisfied, you merge it to the main branch, from where it is …
-
comment
Comment #44938543
It would require a lot more memory, because you have to remember every generated UUID. And how would you do the partial match? You are not going to observe any collisions.
-
comment
Comment #44938522
Doesn't the clustering make collisions strictly more likely?
-
comment
Comment #44938510
You can also look at the expected number of collisions instead, which is approximately the number of random numbers squared, divided by the size of the space of random numbers. The…
-
comment
Comment #44929602
> With that access you can also "do" things, like sending messages or delete stuff. If you break E2E encryption, you can likely also impersonate and "do" things.
-
comment
Comment #44835342
I know some conservative newspapers (Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung) kept using the old orthography for a while, but even they started using the new one in 2007, ten years after th…
-
comment
Comment #44823290
Yes, in this case it would be easier to brute-force the key instead of the password, so the additional characters don't really help.
-
comment
Comment #44821475
Such long passwords are silly, they will be effectively truncated by the key length of the underlying cryptography.
-
comment
Comment #44682382
That's not how errors add up, it's nonlinear. You have to take the sum of squares. So in your case, it wouldn't be 10 * 0.01 = 0.1, but sqrt(10 * 0.01^2) = 0.032, which is less tha…
-
comment
Comment #44617339
I think the argument was about automated killing, not automated weapons. There are already drones from Germany capable of automatic target acquisition, but they still require a hum…
-
comment
Comment #44488744
All the attacks you described also apply to downloading and executing a file. I don't think `curl | sh` is worse in this regard.
-
comment
Comment #44460501
Ok, so how would such a secret end up in a commit? E.g., I don't see why I would have my home address anywhere close to a code repository. Maybe if I used the wrong "secret" email …
-
comment
Comment #44452835
If you rotated the secret, why do anything else? I don't think there is any potential further damage (except maybe reputational).
-
comment
Comment #44307905
> I mean, webp was made by Google and we know how many of their heavily promoted creations are dead already... I don't understand this argument. WebP is an algorithm, not a service…
-
comment
Comment #44179289
Docker is not really a security boundary (unless you use something like gVisor), so it's a bit of a red herring here. The idea is to make your app immutable and store all state in …