Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — whatisweb3

whatisweb3

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jun 20, 2022, 9:03 PM UTC
HN karma
374
Public activity
186 items

About whatisweb3

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #32850606

    Yes, of course this is my opinion. The transition has been years in the making and the amount of research and contributions to computing, distributed systems, and cryptography that…

  2. comment
    Comment #32848629

    Sure? It was both an inefficient and wasteful mechanism to secure consensus. This is why developers have been actively researching and developing how to switch Eth to PoS for years…

  3. comment
    Comment #32848596

    Congrats to the devs. This is a historic moment for computing and distributed tech, and will pave the way for Ethereum’s next updates: scalability, privacy, stronger censorship res…

  4. comment
    Comment #32848532

    Congrats to the devs. This is a historic moment for computing and distributed tech, and will pave the way for Ethereum’s next updates: scalability, privacy, stronger censorship res…

  5. comment
    Comment #32848436

    This is how all tech works - trains, cars, power stations. We build things that are initially inefficient. We eventually transition to energy efficient tech. We celebrate. It’s rar…

  6. comment
    Comment #32831250

    This very sanction is against a tech called “Tornado Cash” which is not an organization or person. If somebody forks the protocol and renames it, and everybody uses it in place of …

  7. comment
    Comment #32814260

    You actually could publish “illegal code” because code is protected under 1st amendment, as free speech. Legal precedent has been set by Bernstein v US DoJ. There is an open questi…

  8. comment
    Comment #32814142

    The open source software and cryptographic protocol is implicitly targeted with this order. You can see it in how private companies are now handling the Tornado Cash code and contr…

  9. comment
    Comment #32813996

    25% of funds being illicit does not mean “pretty much everybody” is using it for illicit reasons. Your argument really falls apart here, but the sweeping generalizations don’t help…

  10. comment
    Comment #32812413

    There is no doubt known cyber criminals and enemies of the US are using this tool. The question I raised is: what percentage of illicit activity is acceptable? If the E2EE chat app…

  11. comment
    Comment #32812107

    Sure. Then it is irrelevant how much money was funding whom, only that a non-zero amount of value was not strictly traceable through typical financial surveillance systems, and so …

  12. comment
    Comment #32810811

    450m is a whopping 6% of all deposits on Tornado Cash[1]. The total percentage of illicit activity on the protocol is reported to be in the 10-30% range[2]. What percentage of acti…

  13. comment
    Comment #32444940

    You did not answer my simple question. :) Sorry to be a broken record by comparing this to E2EE privacy protocols, but many commenters on HN only seem to think privacy is worthwhil…

  14. comment
    Comment #32444574

    The sanctions apply directly to the protocol and it’s code, and this is the issue. It is not applying to persons, or criminal actions. It would be like sanctioning the Matrix proto…

  15. comment
    Comment #32441883

    One exists to facilitate privacy, the other exists to facilitate money laundering. Compare with E2EE Matrix protocol: it does not exist to facilitate criminal communication, but it…

  16. comment
    Comment #32441735

    The point is: the protocol encrypts a private key, a private key is an integer, or text hash. Saying that it is OK to build tools that encrypt text, like Matrix protocol, but it is…

  17. comment
    Comment #32440907

    Sure, we are in agreement then. It is a great thing as it will enable the blockchain to continue to scale for more users and more applications, and it is the opposite of the energy…

  18. comment
    Comment #32440039

    Yes. Like putting a sanction on the open Matrix protocol, and blocking any user who has interacted with it.

  19. comment
    Comment #32439930

    Yes, like computers, the internet, electric trains. Computers used to take up a room and compute a few thousand cycles per second. Now they can fit in our pockets and compute billi…

  20. comment
    Comment #32439725

    A private key is a 256 bit integer. > If someone built something that said "Launder your [256 bit integers] here" and it took in a bunch of [256 bit integers], and then [encrypted]…

  21. comment
    Comment #32439120

    Matrix protocol’s sole purpose is to obscure usernames and messages and enable privacy. Tornado Cash’s sole purpose is to obscure blockchain addresses and enable privacy. Privacy i…

  22. comment
    Comment #32438147

    The first time a developer of open source, non-custodial and autonomous smart contract code has been arrested comes days after the US sanctions the same smart contract. Probably ju…

  23. comment
    Comment #32437909

    There is still no legal precedent around a case like this as it relates to DAOs and autonomous smart contracts, so a law firm could not have told you anything except "we can neithe…

  24. comment
    Comment #32437774

    My comment from 2 days ago: > The US sanctioning Tornado Cash and the resulting repercussions is deeply concerning. Whether or not you like crypto, you should not be supporting thi…

  25. comment
    Comment #32437759

    By this logic every blockchain developer should be arrested. The TC developers are not collecting fees directly, but they probably did give themselves a large supply of tokens to m…