Viewing profile — whatisweb3
whatisweb3
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jun 20, 2022, 9:03 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 374
- Public activity
- 186 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About whatisweb3
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #32850606
Yes, of course this is my opinion. The transition has been years in the making and the amount of research and contributions to computing, distributed systems, and cryptography that…
-
comment
Comment #32848629
Sure? It was both an inefficient and wasteful mechanism to secure consensus. This is why developers have been actively researching and developing how to switch Eth to PoS for years…
-
comment
Comment #32848596
Congrats to the devs. This is a historic moment for computing and distributed tech, and will pave the way for Ethereum’s next updates: scalability, privacy, stronger censorship res…
-
comment
Comment #32848532
Congrats to the devs. This is a historic moment for computing and distributed tech, and will pave the way for Ethereum’s next updates: scalability, privacy, stronger censorship res…
-
comment
Comment #32848436
This is how all tech works - trains, cars, power stations. We build things that are initially inefficient. We eventually transition to energy efficient tech. We celebrate. It’s rar…
-
comment
Comment #32831250
This very sanction is against a tech called “Tornado Cash” which is not an organization or person. If somebody forks the protocol and renames it, and everybody uses it in place of …
-
comment
Comment #32814260
You actually could publish “illegal code” because code is protected under 1st amendment, as free speech. Legal precedent has been set by Bernstein v US DoJ. There is an open questi…
-
comment
Comment #32814142
The open source software and cryptographic protocol is implicitly targeted with this order. You can see it in how private companies are now handling the Tornado Cash code and contr…
-
comment
Comment #32813996
25% of funds being illicit does not mean “pretty much everybody” is using it for illicit reasons. Your argument really falls apart here, but the sweeping generalizations don’t help…
-
comment
Comment #32812413
There is no doubt known cyber criminals and enemies of the US are using this tool. The question I raised is: what percentage of illicit activity is acceptable? If the E2EE chat app…
-
comment
Comment #32812107
Sure. Then it is irrelevant how much money was funding whom, only that a non-zero amount of value was not strictly traceable through typical financial surveillance systems, and so …
-
comment
Comment #32810811
450m is a whopping 6% of all deposits on Tornado Cash[1]. The total percentage of illicit activity on the protocol is reported to be in the 10-30% range[2]. What percentage of acti…
-
comment
Comment #32444940
You did not answer my simple question. :) Sorry to be a broken record by comparing this to E2EE privacy protocols, but many commenters on HN only seem to think privacy is worthwhil…
-
comment
Comment #32444574
The sanctions apply directly to the protocol and it’s code, and this is the issue. It is not applying to persons, or criminal actions. It would be like sanctioning the Matrix proto…
-
comment
Comment #32441883
One exists to facilitate privacy, the other exists to facilitate money laundering. Compare with E2EE Matrix protocol: it does not exist to facilitate criminal communication, but it…
-
comment
Comment #32441735
The point is: the protocol encrypts a private key, a private key is an integer, or text hash. Saying that it is OK to build tools that encrypt text, like Matrix protocol, but it is…
-
comment
Comment #32440907
Sure, we are in agreement then. It is a great thing as it will enable the blockchain to continue to scale for more users and more applications, and it is the opposite of the energy…
-
comment
Comment #32440039
Yes. Like putting a sanction on the open Matrix protocol, and blocking any user who has interacted with it.
-
comment
Comment #32439930
Yes, like computers, the internet, electric trains. Computers used to take up a room and compute a few thousand cycles per second. Now they can fit in our pockets and compute billi…
-
comment
Comment #32439725
A private key is a 256 bit integer. > If someone built something that said "Launder your [256 bit integers] here" and it took in a bunch of [256 bit integers], and then [encrypted]…
-
comment
Comment #32439120
Matrix protocol’s sole purpose is to obscure usernames and messages and enable privacy. Tornado Cash’s sole purpose is to obscure blockchain addresses and enable privacy. Privacy i…
-
comment
Comment #32438147
The first time a developer of open source, non-custodial and autonomous smart contract code has been arrested comes days after the US sanctions the same smart contract. Probably ju…
-
comment
Comment #32437909
There is still no legal precedent around a case like this as it relates to DAOs and autonomous smart contracts, so a law firm could not have told you anything except "we can neithe…
-
comment
Comment #32437774
My comment from 2 days ago: > The US sanctioning Tornado Cash and the resulting repercussions is deeply concerning. Whether or not you like crypto, you should not be supporting thi…
-
comment
Comment #32437759
By this logic every blockchain developer should be arrested. The TC developers are not collecting fees directly, but they probably did give themselves a large supply of tokens to m…