Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — whalebird

whalebird

HN member
Joined
Sun, Nov 10, 2019, 6:14 PM UTC
HN karma
5
Public activity
17 items

About whalebird

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #21531197

    > It's the kind of problem that requires incredible amounts of data, hardware, and theory to make any progress. I wouldn't be surprised if the opposite was true, at least with the …

  2. comment
  3. comment
    Comment #21509754

    I don't think the power dynamics are that clear. The Saudi state is not at all under total control of MBS. Formally, his father is in power, there are other potential heirs to the …

  4. comment
    Comment #21508744

    > You've got to be kidding. It is plausible in the sense of "plausible deniability". Imagine MBS saying something like "That Khashoggi guy, I wish somebody hacked him to pieces!". …

  5. comment
    Comment #21505675

    There's no such thing as bad publicity.

  6. comment
    Comment #21505617

    Do you really think that's what he should have said? Because that sounds like a vastly dumber thing to say, even if it's "honest". The "rogue operation" story is "good enough". It'…

  7. comment
    Comment #21505350

    Look, as far as the broader argument for or against nuclear goes, we are one the same side . I actually want you to have strong position. > Of course you can't calculate the risk o…

  8. comment
    Comment #21501914

    > I am not ignoring anything I am simply pointing to the fact that when we talk wind and solar the true cost isn't calculated whereas with nuclear it is. I agree with you on wind/s…

  9. comment
    Comment #21500923

    > All sources of energy have financial consequences if they go wrong, we use them anyway because the value they provide to society vastly outperform occasional disasters. All energ…

  10. comment
    Comment #21500517

    This isn't an insurance against catastrophic failure on the order of Fukushima or Chernobyl, which run into the hundreds of billions, if not trillions. Of course you can have an in…

  11. comment
    Comment #21500475

    The negative prices paid on EPEX did not exist until 2007 on the German/Austrian market[1], which clearly coincides with the green energy rollout in Germany.

  12. comment
    Comment #21500429

    The marginal cost of renewables isn't zero, producing it causes more wear and tear than not producing it. Furthermore, if you pay negative prices as a result of a renewable surge, …

  13. comment
    Comment #21499512

    > Negative grid prices are the consequences of power plants which cannot shut down in times of oversupply, that is mainly coal and nuclear. Riddle me this, then: Why did negative e…

  14. comment
    Comment #21499450

    > Most humans born today will experience the negative effects of climate change over the next 80 years, with between 10-30% of them dying due to events caused by it. [citation desp…

  15. comment
    Comment #21499425

    Insured by whom? You need to understand how insurance companies operate: They gather data, they calculate the risk vs. the cost of paying out, they add a markup - that's your price…

  16. comment
    Comment #21499389

    > You might assume this is just some techno-weenie blogger that's getting too excited about one of his hobbies, but if you look at the official submissions from companies aiming to…

  17. comment
    Comment #21499373

    The issue is that you won't find an insurance company willing to insure a risk that they can't calculate. There's too little data to find a price here. In the end, the government a…