Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — whaaswijk

whaaswijk

HN member
Joined
Thu, Nov 27, 2014, 4:40 PM UTC
HN karma
78
Public activity
46 items

About whaaswijk

GitHub: https://github.com/whaaswijk Web page: https://whaaswijk.github.io

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #43783670

    What makes it so much harder to publish a CL game on Steam versus a C++ game?

  2. comment
    Comment #42318084

    Legalese seems to me a different category more akin to technical writing. I wouldn’t classify difficulty understanding a legal document as a general lack of reading comprehension. …

  3. comment
    Comment #35969056

    I’m not sure I should start a conversation on metaphysics here :-D Still, I’m struck by your use of words like “should” and “goal”. Those imply ethics and teleology so I’m curious …

  4. comment
    Comment #35967895

    I don’t understand your position. Are you saying it’s okay for computers to kill humans but not okay for humans to kill each other?

  5. comment
    Comment #35118520

    I think it would be “sphericles”.

  6. comment
    Comment #35082988

    I think that’s right. The analogy for straight men would be that they may want to love and sleep with many women but that it’s still wrong unless within a marriage.

  7. comment
    Comment #35082921

    AFAIK original sin does teach that all men are fallen and require salvation. This doesn’t mean that human nature is all bad and it’s indeed not the same as total depravity. However…

  8. comment
    Comment #34402911

    What’s the “something else” you’re currently using?

  9. comment
    Comment #34363152

    While I agree that simulation theory pushes the question up a level, that is not the case for the God of classical theism.

  10. comment
    Comment #34287297

    I think a key difference with humans is that ChatGPT doesn’t know that it doesn’t know.

  11. comment
    Comment #34195752

    This is surprising to hear. From my perspective as accomplices scientist being a doctor strikes me as one of the few jobs where you are obviously and directly helping people, thus …

  12. comment
    Comment #33868237

    So there can be no redemption? I can’t, off the top of my head, think of any endeavors where someone can never participate again once they’ve cheated. Certainly not in sports.

  13. comment
    Comment #33213552

    I hope you’re joking because that actually sounds like a terribly impoverished life for a human consciousness.

  14. comment
    Comment #32729898

    I have some anecdotal evidence against this. Learning how to write automated proofs using Isabel and HOL definitely improved my ability to write proofs with pen and paper. Also, I …

  15. comment
    Comment #32649888

    Thanks, that sounds like a good strategy. I’ll have a look at the Accelerate book. > how can you be expected to do better than practices espoused by industry leading research and c…

  16. comment
    Comment #32645185

    I think the “doing your work well” part is often the question. Am I really doing all I can? Could I do better/more? This then leads to working more and being busier. Maybe the prob…

  17. comment
    Comment #32644503

    I mostly agree with your post. I’m just curious about which variables people care about most and how accurate your “far and away” statement is. For example, a quick google search s…

  18. comment
    Comment #32640790

    That’s actually not clear to me. Anecdotally I have often experienced the saying “opposite attract” to be true. I have had discussions with friends who hold your point of view. Of …

  19. comment
    Comment #32431108

    Is there a mechanism in place to stop people from laundering money with ethereum? This is a serious question, I’m a total noob when it comes to crypto.

  20. comment
    Comment #31823664

    I’m not sure the analogy to gravity works. At least in the case of gravity we have a model which (largely) explains the planetary orbits. As far as I know, we are not even close to…

  21. comment
    Comment #31808024

    What explanation are you referring to though? Just saying consciousness is an emergent property is not an explanation. Rather it is an assertion.

  22. comment
    Comment #31257064

    Grass and trees and such. Perhaps bushes and animals too.

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #30700273

    Are there any experts that can ELI5 this “breakthrough” for us? How much closer does this bring us to a useful number of logical qubits?

  25. comment
    Comment #30212413

    I guess this is where we differ. I don't see a sufficient reason to believe that increasing computational capacity/complexity alone gives rise to consciousness. Moreover, I think t…