Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — welterde

welterde

HN member
Joined
Sun, Mar 31, 2013, 8:36 PM UTC
HN karma
926
Public activity
522 items

About welterde

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #46471499

    This is already a thing in IPv6 pretty much. You can write applications IPv6-only and support IPv4 via IPv4-mapped addresses (::ffff:1.2.3.4 for the IPv4 1.2.3.4). The host still n…

  2. comment
    Comment #46471357

    The problem is that IPv4 has no provisions to be forward-compatible with anything with a larger address space. Thus whatever replacement you can think of will have the same problem…

  3. comment
    Comment #44376543

    For applications that were written with X11 in mind it works much much better than that. One example was the controlling a telescope. The computers in the control room were thin cl…

  4. comment
    Comment #42839892

    > For SSH forwarding you could have SSH ask the X server for a new socket for forwarding purposes - so remote clients can't snoop on local clients. SSH pretty much already does thi…

  5. comment
    Comment #42839810

    Some aspects of the client isolation are used by default when doing X11 forwarding via SSH. A remote keylogger will not work for instance.

  6. comment
    Comment #41901492

    IPv6 clients (or in theory any kind of IPv4 successor) can reach IPv4 servers via some kind of translation layer (for example NAT64) - so IPv6 is backwards-compatible with IPv4 in …

  7. comment
    Comment #41895676

    Reliability is certainly one aspect where dedicated tracks helps a lot, but is not the only solution (see for example Switzerland). For Germany the issue is the overall too large u…

  8. comment
    Comment #41858022

    That has very little to do with the ICE train itself though, which can do above 320 km/h just fine in regular service (on international connections though, since in Germany the glo…

  9. comment
    Comment #41193641

    If I read the datasheet correctly you still need an inductor and some passive components externally. The only thing that is not needed is an external switch mode power supply chip.…

  10. comment
    Comment #40544292

    The X11 primary selection buffer is an even better variant of that though. It allows single-shot copy&paste (meaning only one application can grab it) from the password manager to …

  11. comment
    Comment #40273476

    Nothing preventing you from writing a X11 server in something else either (and people have done so!). But fact is, most wayland compositors right now are either pure C or C++ (and …

  12. comment
    Comment #40272804

    It is only one old C codebase however (or a couple if one counts the *BSD semi-forks separately) instead of many different fresh c codebases (one per compositor with some shared co…

  13. comment
    Comment #40272542

    X11 does have various ways to restrict access (one of which ssh does use for instance) and some more advanced security extensions. But as far as I can tell there has never been tha…

  14. comment
    Comment #40180687

    Maybe the problem was with your specific setup or applications? Because at the observatory it worked flawlessly. Between the local data reduction machine (beefy server) and the des…

  15. comment
    Comment #40180495

    That's perfectly possible with X11 to attach via VNC to an existing session. But what X11 over (local) network does way better than either RDP or VNC is to run individual applicati…

  16. comment
    Comment #40180224

    That is not true. There are extensions to the X11 server that can resolve many of the security issues, but almost no one cares enough to use them. If you are doing X11 forwarding v…

  17. comment
    Comment #40179818

    Not sure having shared memory and socket open to N fresh and under active feature development c codebases is that much more conducive to security? (N since while many compositors u…

  18. comment
    Comment #40178873

    There seems to be XACE/XSELinux, which seemingly exists in the mainline Xorg distro now. I wonder how the experience is with that? In practice I think it doesn't see any adoption, …

  19. comment
    Comment #40043076

    Only for IPv4 destinations however, where there is no other way. For IPv6 destinations it's just native connectivity with no NAT.

  20. comment
    Comment #40039605

    What do you mean it has never been tried? That's how a lot of mobile providers and home internet providers operate today. My provider in Germany was already using DS-Lite (native I…

  21. comment
    Comment #39968101

    That 22k limit is only for the small business rule, which allows the choice of not collecting VAT on sales (but on the flip side cannot deduct it on purchases). Up to a yearly reve…

  22. comment
    Comment #39968058

    There are 2M sole proprietorships in Germany and around 0.4M partnership type companies (Personengesellschaft; GbR, etc.) and aside from the aspect of trying to appear like a large…

  23. comment
    Comment #39941201

    The relevant part is that they moved from another city to Munich, which means that certain company taxes would be paid in Munich instead of Unterschleißheim (the city where the HQ …

  24. comment
    Comment #39103727

    Because it gets repeated on every thread on IPv6. IPv6 is perfectly backwards-compatible with IPv4 (you can run an IPv6-only host and still access hosts from the IPv4-internet). Th…

  25. comment
    Comment #37567304

    Windows actually used to have 6to4 setup by default in the past. There is no need to manually configure anything since the 6to4 have a globally unique anycast address and the ipv6 …