Viewing profile — weff_
weff_
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Oct 11, 2019, 8:31 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 33
- Public activity
- 21 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About weff_
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25827429
>All of these seem like very reasonable justifications to rethink the way we build software, to change what's standard practice or to invent new tools that solve old problems in a …
-
comment
Comment #25826688
That's a definition of engineering. How isn't that like claiming you're a chef because you have a catering company where you serve microwaved foods, and claim it's silly to try to …
-
comment
Comment #25826645
>the discipline is all of 20-30 years old. How do you define software engineering such that it's 20-30 years old? Why isn't it 50 years old? I ask because I've heard the argument t…
-
comment
Comment #25769524
That's fair, thanks for answering, cheers :)
-
comment
Comment #25764704
If you will, could you speak more to > we have people who create studies to test our efficacy and help inform future course development. We care about proving the efficacy of our a…
-
comment
Comment #25043176
The 'living in harsh conditions makes you a crazy good fighter" is a meme though, as this historian explains: https://acoup.blog/2020/01/17/collections-the-fremen-mirage-...
-
comment
Comment #23059150
I think Go tries to reduce its dependence on libc but, by default, it will still link to it. For instance, this code: package main import "net" func main(){ net.Dial("tcp", "golang…
-
comment
Comment #22218926
That's interesting. I don't think as optimized memory manipulation via convoluted casting and such as "complex stuff". I think of that as optimization. I thought what the author me…
-
comment
Comment #22215408
So when is it appropriate to do complex things?
-
comment
Comment #21537458
At the end of the day, it boils down to dependency management, wouldn't you say? That is, Python2 could be running forever if the environment is maintained. In the same vein, a mes…
-
comment
Comment #21229698
I heard so much about the actor model, I should really try it in its intended glory one day.
-
comment
Comment #21229691
Very true, I had not even thought about the multiprocessing package; it's sometimes not as convenient as multithreading but it'll get those other cores working.
-
comment
Comment #21229683
Can you expand a bit on that? I'm not familiar with the issue you're describing.
-
comment
Comment #21229577
Is that like the relationship between C# and PowerShell?
-
comment
Comment #21229560
> the right tool for the job! Hear, hear!
-
comment
Comment #21229406
Is that a bit like Go's `go` keyword? edit: that is, as far as I can tell, after a quick Google, it's not too different from Python's Thread object.
-
comment
Comment #21228855
As I've posted above, I'm a bit confused by CPU-bound work being processed in a scripting language. If you're planning on doing intense CPU-bound work, maybe use a lower-level lang…
-
comment
Comment #21228835
as I posted above: I agree the GIL is a problem but it's only an issue for CPU-bound problems. Is there really an important amount of CPU-bound work that is written in a scripting …
-
comment
Comment #21228830
I agree the GIL is a problem but it's only an issue for CPU-bound problems. Is there really an important amount of CPU-bound work that is written in a scripting language? If it's C…
-
comment
Comment #21228814
Ovid2 said Perl6 has a good concurrency model lliamander replied that Elixir does too and it's worth a look To that, 7thaccount replied that Perl6 and Elixir fill different niches.…
-
comment
Comment #21228180
I'm trying to understand, what kind of scripting requires first-class concurrency that isn't fulfilled by say Python?