Viewing profile — web3isgoing
web3isgoing
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Nov 16, 2022, 12:43 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 5
- Public activity
- 41 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About web3isgoing
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #33746366
Open source, public and permissionless infrastructure for the web. Very different than Venmo which is owned by PayPal and limited to USA, and not programmable, no interop. about th…
-
comment
Comment #33744996
Venmo[1] does not have reversibility. Cash does not have reversibility. If users really wanted credit card functionality at the expense of its costs, you could build that as a laye…
-
comment
Comment #33744120
Yes, if the application and its users demand it. Reversibility is possible in peer-to-peer and decentralized payment systems. But not every app needs reversibility and the centrali…
-
comment
Comment #33744059
ZK rollup with validity proofs and trustless escape hatches should really be the dominant mode of bridging and storing assets in the future.[1] To the OP: sorry to hear what you ar…
-
comment
Comment #33721528
For some users and use cases, they are.
-
comment
Comment #33718203
Your analogy makes no sense. There are many users who just want to hold crypto and perform basic lending and exchanges, and would be willing to spend fractionally more in gas fees …
-
comment
Comment #33717734
DeFi never claims to provide the exact same fiat and off-chain services as CeFi and CEX. It has specific goals, like replacing custody with non-custody, or replacing a centralized …
-
comment
Comment #33716147
The goals of DeFi and web3 is to create structures that do not rely on centralized service providers, and are able to resist control of single bad actors and provide certain clear …
-
comment
Comment #33712400
Isn’t that the point? The protocols are built to resist changes by single entities and continue working as expected, handling user deposits non custodially, regardless of market ac…
-
comment
Comment #33708968
The irony of this post criticizing DeFi and blockchain in the wake of FTX is that those decentralized applications are working just fine in this downturn. Aave and Uniswap aren’t f…
-
comment
Comment #33705136
> So are blockchains. However, blockchains are much harder to secure, since they need to preserve the order of the ledger (for Bitcoin that's a total-order; there are some chains w…
-
comment
Comment #33704267
If you look at crypto's daily price action, the majority of it is attributable to trading and speculation. I think this is pretty common knowledge. If you feel stocks and equities …
-
comment
Comment #33694019
One failure of FTX and BlockFi is that users had no way to ensure that the centralized custodian was not running off with their on-chain deposits by directing them into unsound dep…
-
comment
Comment #33691878
Partly UX, partly marketing, partly L1 fees and speed. Partly that a lot of people don’t know what Uniswap is. It gets a passing mention in the news if lucky, or more likely no men…
-
comment
Comment #33690333
Fiat assets was addressed in the post. Stablecoins can be used to avoid price volatility, and work within the framework Vitalik is suggesting.
-
comment
Comment #33690283
This math is not for end users of an exchange, it’s for developers and researchers building new exchanges. The UX does not need to feel that different than any regular app.
-
comment
Comment #33690273
A lot of people like trading, just look at Robinhood. It would be good if an app like Robinhood existed that ensured cryptographic guardrails to prevent the platform owners from ly…
-
comment
Comment #33690233
Verifiable computation. See Pinnochio and RISC Zero. https://eprint.iacr.org/2013/279.pdf https://www.risczero.com/
-
comment
Comment #33690227
Vitalik isn’t running any DEXes, he is not in a position where he can steal or move user funds locked into a DeFi contract. He could suggest a change that might do something malici…
-
comment
Comment #33643908
I can’t think of anything else that China is attempting to restrict that the rest of the developed world is open to. Edit: perhaps need a /s tag here.
-
comment
Comment #33643868
Depends where you live. Most developed countries are moving away from cash. Some already have.
-
comment
Comment #33643022
And how do you plan to host and distribute that? If not GitHub, maybe your own site, but neither is tamper proof or verifiably secure. In both cases the repo owner can delete commi…
-
comment
Comment #33642899
Succinctness means the proof size is smaller than the witness, and that it can be verified quickly. So your proof size and verification time can remain small even with large inputs…
-
comment
Comment #33642894
A document is not a ledger. The blockchain is the distribution mechanism.
-
comment
Comment #33639950
The problem I outline is not about a physical to digital link. It is essentially about decentralization and using a tamper proof append-only log to store key events and signatures.…