Viewing profile — wbxrs
wbxrs
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Feb 21, 2019, 2:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 61
- Public activity
- 22 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About wbxrs
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #19232978
What happens in China is the result of not having been brainwashed since childhood about how bad authoritarianism is.
-
comment
Comment #19232947
Yeah, instead we have US occupation in many other countries. And US military bases all around the world. Yahoo!
-
comment
Comment #19232739
This is SO COOL. But I was expecting it to have maps from HL too! I am not saying that HL invented "noclip", but it's certainly my first experience with that concept, even though I…
-
comment
Comment #19232502
Given that your comment is contrary to what the submitted post says and what all comments here say, some proof would be appropriate. You are using strong words.
-
comment
Comment #19230444
It's not like this is their first. And yes, companies like these have too much political power. That's something we all know. The question is how to fix that.
-
comment
Comment #19229437
You have a point, I guess I had never seen it that way.
-
comment
Comment #19229065
Looking at those charts, why are libertarians considered right-wing? They may be so economically, but they definitely are to the left (or even the far left) socially. Giving that t…
-
comment
Comment #19226392
I think it is perfectly reasonable for a client to use more RAM than a server, having to display a GUI and all. I'm thinking of IRC servers vs. clients. (Certainly not 2 GB, but th…
-
comment
Comment #19224562
2 GB of RAM for a chat server?!!?
-
comment
Comment #19224419
A website cannot tell a browser to "load malware", unless we're talking about a exploit, which should be patched. (Please don't say "if I send you a malformed png file you have to …
-
comment
Comment #19224340
By default, unless the user has changed his settings, if a website tells a browser to load something, the browser should do so.
-
comment
Comment #19224334
>The alternative is what we do now: a select group with tech savvy blocks advertisements, and lets the masses pick up the bill by 'accepting' ads and having their every movement on…
-
comment
Comment #19224267
Do you expect them to get nothing in return?
-
comment
Comment #19224191
I think this is a bad idea. Even though I personally block 3rd party trackers by default, breaking the web by default will cause problems. Also, ad blocking will start being a prob…
-
comment
Comment #19219254
...and? Don't they have categories for every political leaning?
-
comment
Comment #19219045
That's the point of free speech: the state shouldn't put a cost on speaking your mind.
-
comment
Comment #19217371
It is not the job of the government to preserve "civilised discourse". It is a government, not the moderator of an Internet forum. I must be able to say whatever I want, and you mu…
-
comment
Comment #19217253
The truth of the matter is that this woman said Mohammed was a paedophile for fucking a 9 year old (which is even correct according to the Quran). She was convicted in Austria for …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #19217140
>Maybe this will revitalize hosting of personal websites where there’s no “platform” to censor your free speech? In Germany, Austria and Switzerland you are required to disclose yo…
-
comment
Comment #19217075
>Don't frame this as a free speech issue. Freedom of speech is as protected in the EU as it is in the US, possibly more. Yeah, no. This (blasphemy laws) would be unthinkable in the…