Viewing profile — wav-part

Ultrawealthy Ought to Help https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PGMQZEIXBMs

You are overlooking a simple fact: Rich dont want to pay taxes. You will always have problems when taking from the rich. 800 years ago It was barron rebellion (Magna Carta). Now it…

Call it DNSSEC or whatever, DNS needs more crypto. At present security of DNS rely on manual intervention, 2FA, "multi-perspective DNS lookups" and other rituals. That does not sca…

DNSSEC+DANE replaces registrars. The entity would push signed request directly to tld.

Or who would lose from DNSSEC getting adopted ? CAs. This is a fight for cert revenue: CAs vs ICANN.

Its not like Corporations can pay someone else, say US or China, to protect their assets and people. US totally wont f k EUs shit up for few hundreds of billions. No sir, countries…

US bombs. China builds.

Case in point: 2018 Federal taxes centralized $3.4T in the hands of 300 people.

Which gov gets the money and why ?

> Alternatively, they introduce an involatile shared fiction into the public conscious, that justifies their position Like democracy=good, populism=bad ?

How does a democracy (or any governance system backed by public will) survive if there is a 50/50 split in public will ?

We do not consume energy. We consume goods and services which require energy to produce. This model completely ignores past and future advancments in energy efficieny.

Whos paying for safer buldings/milk/etc ? Could not the people who just benefited from these laws, give money directly to the businesses ? If people really want and can fund someth…

Businesses did not make buildings safer just because someone told them to. It is naturally considered a bad idea to kill your customers. Businesses would always create an environme…

But how much of that is due to "fire code" ? Compare it with lawless parts of the world. You would find that horrible-ness is going down everywhere. China advanced only after havin…

What people did before there were fire code ? How did they get out ?

Browser vendors (specifically all DNS users) have the option. They can do it, if IANA fails at the job of being a dnsroot. Disruption is inversely proportional to consensus. If eve…

Anyone can fork DNS. Its just a (name, key) map. As long as its done with enough consensus , it can be done. Mismanagement of .com is serious enough to demand that kind of change. …

You is firefox/chrome/etc. Yes you can. The ownership of .com is not as exclusive/protected as .xxx or xxx.com. Thus the firefox/chrome/etc can map it to anyone they feel. Consider…

No. You just map .com to another key with an agreement that new .com owner pre signs and map existing .com subs the right way . An unaware xxx.com does not need to do anything. As …

Current: Google need to watch all CAs. DNSSEC: Google need to watch .com and dnsroot. Which one is better ? ---- (I am ratelimited so posting here rather than reply to the child po…

I am not suggesting every client do their own mapping, that is not a naming system at all. There has to be very large consenus for a naming system to be effective. I just pointed t…

Except there has to be a crypto proof why Google owns google.com not me. That means we need to secure dns. Then why need CAs at all ? Whats the point ?

> No. You have to trust all the CAs, and the governments that control the DNS. Not in DNSSEC. .xxx need only trust dnsroot. yyy.xxx need only trust .yyy and dnsroot. firefox/chrome…

You have to trust somone under DNS. The only trustless naming system I can think of is over a PoWChain (eg example.btc). Still you have 3 choices in DNSSEC/DANE, - get a .xxx, trus…