Viewing profile — warsheep
warsheep
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 03, 2013, 10:32 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 139
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About warsheep
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44853066
What you're describing is a simplified version of gradient descent (tweaking the weights) and online learning (working on one sample at a time). This version will not get you far, …
-
comment
Comment #44366365
Not sure how you can compare vscode with TRAMP. A lot of dev work nowdays is done in containers where you install specific versions of dev tools, compilers, etc. Vscode is one clic…
-
comment
Comment #41585121
Let me get this straight. * A west-aligned country is at war with a terrorist organization which is part of the Russian-Iranian-North Korean axis of evil. * A war which the terrori…
-
comment
Comment #30271577
Isn't this a circular argument? The question was what "useful" things do these crypto solutions/companies provide, and your example is a product which allows regulated entities to …
-
comment
Comment #26769099
The solution you suggest is irrelevant to the issue mentioned in the article. Even if you use np.random.RandomState, or any other "explicit RNG state", that state will still be cop…
- story
-
comment
Comment #26098888
Why use autoscaling and not just launch the instance directly from lambda? The run time is short so there's no danger of two instances running in parallel
-
comment
Comment #15822938
> Convolutional layers are just simplifications which make training easier. They are priors in the sense that we know a fully connected layer in image applications would just devol…
-
comment
Comment #13679289
Sorry, I meant the claim about f and g. Assuming you meant that F(I) should be continuous functions, you can construct an h from f,g to be cont on I and J, no? So it's not an axiom…
-
comment
Comment #13678810
I don't understand why the claim in your second paragraph is an axiom. Doesn't it follow trivially from your definition?
-
comment
Comment #10565083
Interesting articles, thanks!
-
comment
Comment #10565010
The US, France, and other European countries I can actually understand, since these countries performed military operations in Iraq and/or Syria, but I'll be very surprised if Isra…
-
comment
Comment #10564937
A lot of "may" and "might" in your reply, and absolutely no facts. The facts are that on ISIS' agenda, fighting Palestinian groups such as Hamas has a higher priority than fighting…
-
comment
Comment #9487494
I think the context you've quoted only further proves my point. This sentence means absolutely nothing to me, it's trivial and devoid of any actionable information. But because the…
-
comment
Comment #9486505
I'm going to sound very aggressive, but I don't understand the point of this book. They say > The material in this book is too valuable not to share. and after reading the sample I…
-
comment
Comment #9096921
Can you (or someone else) explain the need for the language to be functional?
-
comment
Comment #8722611
This comment is very confusing. First of all, the linked paper doesn't state what you claim it states. The authors show equivalence between two specific frameworks of neural networ…
-
comment
Comment #7501110
You probably already know this, but setting up a cross-compiler toolchain is a super annoying task, and is very dependent on the distro you're using. I'm sure the author knows abou…
-
comment
Comment #6932111
Moxie is a great researcher and WhisperSystems seem serious. However, I don't understand why you claim that TextSecure is designed by cryptographers. From what I've seen, they use …
-
comment
Comment #6198413
I've read most of LYAH, and I have no problem understanding mathematical concepts, but man, Haskell people truely don't know how to convey this "awesomeness" they keep talking abou…