Viewing profile — w29UiIm2Xz
w29UiIm2Xz
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 05, 2025, 5:25 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 90
- Public activity
- 38 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About w29UiIm2Xz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #49136105
Not a single one of these tools tell me how much I just spent when I issue a prompt and it finishes inference.
-
comment
Comment #49113301
Enterprises implemented spending caps and inference providers are lowering prices. Seems they are jockeying for market share.
- comment
- comment
- comment
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48812247
If AI replaces labor, that's a trillion dollars of labor. About one-fifteenth of annual labor/wage earnings.
-
comment
Comment #48800163
The bottleneck wasn't the coding, but previously it had the second order effect of slowing product development decisions enough to improve product cohesion.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48646070
I'm not sure if I'd want to code without an LLM anymore. That said, there will always be open models.
-
comment
Comment #48619431
I encountered many a web service that do not use HTTP verbs correctly.
-
comment
Comment #48605488
A simpler solution to this would be to introduce new ETF tickers for changed rules. It's a breaking change -- version it.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48566088
What's the adage, it is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48546388
The upper middle class' opinions and reflections on business seem to be shifting in this environment. It seems less mutually beneficial than it used to be.
-
comment
Comment #48468936
To be fair, the vibes (at the time) were that Microsoft has changed. Probably, in some way, a zero-interest rate phenomena.
-
comment
Comment #48455660
It's disappointing that this article got mindshare when a more neutral author could better argue the bearish case for AI valuations. I want the steelman argument from a more respec…
-
comment
Comment #48450366
Productivity is defined revenue per worker hour. And we know worker hours are going down as there are fewer workers with the layoffs.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #48339030
Those people could've traded up. And plenty of people in the trades have done that. But now, it is not obvious what 'trading up' in this situation is. There was optionality: upskil…
-
comment
Comment #48338907
No technology will have me "excited" if the prospect is lower/no compensation and poorer working conditions. I concur on the nuance -- I use it as a tool at work. I see value in it…
-
comment
Comment #48337674
Nobody who trades their labor for income would legitimately trust simply getting money for existing because we created such surplus. What happens if the checks stop rolling? It is …
- comment