Viewing profile — vyodaiken
vyodaiken
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 26, 2016, 7:14 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 146
- Public activity
- 231 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About vyodaiken
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #37169583
It's ironic that Musks two big successes were funded by the Obama administration against vehement Republican objections. Shelby repeatedly tried to kill Space-X and without the $40…
-
comment
Comment #32808456
The interdata was a strange machine architecture - before the era where everything started to look the same. Via Wikipedia: https://books.google.com/books?id=pWBoOXVjuZ0C&dq=%227%2…
-
comment
Comment #32808278
It's interesting how often people repeat this argument as if it were persuasive. The compiler developers and Standards writers made an engineering decision which is hard to justify…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #31084304
Good explanation of my overly terse note. The current standard interrupt architecture imposes enormous latency and the synchronous timer could be more precise. The simplest impleme…
- story
-
comment
Comment #28799011
A) there is no evidence such phenomena - especially in net- are due to unsafe optimizations, b) those companies dont need to shift their costs to other users
-
comment
Comment #28794652
You still don't have any data.
-
comment
Comment #28794639
It's because C has pointers and FORTRAN doesn't and pointers are a pain for certain types of optimization.
-
comment
Comment #28793513
Your argument would be more compelling if programming languages with higher level iteration primitives were significantly more optimizable than C. The underlying processor architec…
-
comment
Comment #28780722
I doubt that very much, and one of the points of the article is that there is a shortage of data to back up claims like yours. In any case, for people who want to write OS or crypt…
-
comment
Comment #28780412
There was no size_t in K&R1. Size_t was introduced in the standards process as was the definition of index variables in the for loop. You may have a complain with the standard ther…
-
comment
Comment #28780351
It is because they are "free" and also because they attract massive investment from FAANG and National Labs etc.
-
comment
Comment #28780338
Nobody claims optimizations are not important.
-
comment
Comment #28780307
Maybe you should tell the Linux developers that they are making a mistake.
- story
-
comment
Comment #28322686
if it was a randomly selected function, which it is not.
-
comment
Comment #27746725
The most interesting thing is that his critique of Pascal type rigidity applies to C Standard C, which is very different from C.
- story
-
comment
Comment #27652550
This proposal is moving through the C standards process and I was curious about whether people think it is a good idea. It appears to have a lot of backing in the Committee ( I am …
- story
-
comment
Comment #27257597
https://www.yodaiken.com/2021/05/16/c-is-not-a-serious-progr...
- story
-
comment
Comment #27247844
Send Linux Torvalds a note and tell him he has only superficial knowledge of C.