Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — vyodaiken

vyodaiken

HN member
Joined
Tue, Jan 26, 2016, 7:14 PM UTC
HN karma
146
Public activity
231 items

About vyodaiken

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #37169583

    It's ironic that Musks two big successes were funded by the Obama administration against vehement Republican objections. Shelby repeatedly tried to kill Space-X and without the $40…

  2. comment
    Comment #32808456

    The interdata was a strange machine architecture - before the era where everything started to look the same. Via Wikipedia: https://books.google.com/books?id=pWBoOXVjuZ0C&dq=%227%2…

  3. comment
    Comment #32808278

    It's interesting how often people repeat this argument as if it were persuasive. The compiler developers and Standards writers made an engineering decision which is hard to justify…

  4. story
  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #31084304

    Good explanation of my overly terse note. The current standard interrupt architecture imposes enormous latency and the synchronous timer could be more precise. The simplest impleme…

  7. story
  8. comment
    Comment #28799011

    A) there is no evidence such phenomena - especially in net- are due to unsafe optimizations, b) those companies dont need to shift their costs to other users

  9. comment
    Comment #28794652

    You still don't have any data.

  10. comment
    Comment #28794639

    It's because C has pointers and FORTRAN doesn't and pointers are a pain for certain types of optimization.

  11. comment
    Comment #28793513

    Your argument would be more compelling if programming languages with higher level iteration primitives were significantly more optimizable than C. The underlying processor architec…

  12. comment
    Comment #28780722

    I doubt that very much, and one of the points of the article is that there is a shortage of data to back up claims like yours. In any case, for people who want to write OS or crypt…

  13. comment
    Comment #28780412

    There was no size_t in K&R1. Size_t was introduced in the standards process as was the definition of index variables in the for loop. You may have a complain with the standard ther…

  14. comment
    Comment #28780351

    It is because they are "free" and also because they attract massive investment from FAANG and National Labs etc.

  15. comment
    Comment #28780338

    Nobody claims optimizations are not important.

  16. comment
    Comment #28780307

    Maybe you should tell the Linux developers that they are making a mistake.

  17. story
  18. comment
    Comment #28322686

    if it was a randomly selected function, which it is not.

  19. comment
    Comment #27746725

    The most interesting thing is that his critique of Pascal type rigidity applies to C Standard C, which is very different from C.

  20. story
  21. comment
    Comment #27652550

    This proposal is moving through the C standards process and I was curious about whether people think it is a good idea. It appears to have a lot of backing in the Committee ( I am …

  22. story
  23. comment
    Comment #27257597

    https://www.yodaiken.com/2021/05/16/c-is-not-a-serious-progr...

  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #27247844

    Send Linux Torvalds a note and tell him he has only superficial knowledge of C.