Viewing profile — voxcogitatio
voxcogitatio
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 05, 2009, 8:20 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 248
- Public activity
- 36 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About voxcogitatio
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #2268650
I'm glad to hear that they've catched up to the original UNIX. :)
-
comment
Comment #2266823
Benjamin Pierce considered troll.
-
comment
Comment #2266801
The "You need a PHD to understand Haskell" slur is so bloody ridiculous. I certainly didn't have a problem with it, and I haven't even finished my degree yet! On a more general not…
-
comment
Comment #2205826
Yes, but large projects often need to use recursive makefiles, which are notoriously flaky at detecting what has changed (if anything).
-
comment
Comment #2084082
No this is what a GPL developer considers a "loss". Specifically, yet another demonstration of why developing for someone else's walled garden is a bad idea.
-
comment
Comment #2063921
I'm not sure that Haskell could, given time, subsume dynamically typed programming. But even if it is possible, why would it be desirable? Most Haskell people don't think very high…
-
comment
Comment #2032395
Icaza has a long history of being a microsoft shill, I can't say I'm suprised to see him leap to his master's defence once again.
-
comment
Comment #1976810
The confusion about the use case of NoSQL probably stems from the term "NoSQL" being so vaguely defined. All you can say for sure about one is that it's not relational. But other t…
-
comment
Comment #1935796
Remember, you can also use any language that compiles to Java bytecode on a JVM. A short list includes Scala, Clojure, Ruby, Python, Groovy and even Javascript(via Rhino). So the J…
- story
-
comment
Comment #1727990
There is also the matter that the whole "correctness vs. productivity" debate is a false opposite. There is nothing mutually contradictive with correctness and productivity, so the…
-
comment
Comment #1727965
Of course human error applies here too; But it's much simpler to get one type right than to use the type in the right way everywhere. Per example: The Red-Black-Tree implementation…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #1641652
It's amusing watching the author use purple prose over a single blinking LED. I bet if Steve Jobs gave him a turd he would describe it as "that which makes the flowers grow, with a…
-
comment
Comment #1272006
It continues to amaze me how many and adamant apple's apologists are. Stockholm syndrome?
-
comment
Comment #1187781
Let's assume that the author is right when he says that all companies ignore linux. What would make that such a big disaster? Is there some specific proprietary app that _needs_ to…
-
comment
Comment #1143406
I'm not sure i agree with graham on this one. Certainly it's useful and necessary to keep some brevity, however his jab at design patterns is a schoolbook false opposite (if you do…
-
comment
Comment #1101525
To me the really interesting question is how Microsoft ever got to be a monopoly in the first place, with the kind of products they've been making. What made windows and office suc…
-
comment
Comment #1086334
I disagree with the main premise: That as long as you provide the "90% functionality" (i.e mail,chat e.t.c), no casual user will miss the last 10%. Sure, most of the time this will…
-
comment
Comment #1086251
Several problems with this article: 1: Critique against mouse and keyboard rings hollow. It's stuck around so far because it "just works" for a large number of apps. Touchscreens n…
- story
- story
- story
- story
- story