Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — voxcogitatio

voxcogitatio

HN member
Joined
Tue, May 05, 2009, 8:20 PM UTC
HN karma
248
Public activity
36 items

About voxcogitatio

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #2268650

    I'm glad to hear that they've catched up to the original UNIX. :)

  2. comment
    Comment #2266823

    Benjamin Pierce considered troll.

  3. comment
    Comment #2266801

    The "You need a PHD to understand Haskell" slur is so bloody ridiculous. I certainly didn't have a problem with it, and I haven't even finished my degree yet! On a more general not…

  4. comment
    Comment #2205826

    Yes, but large projects often need to use recursive makefiles, which are notoriously flaky at detecting what has changed (if anything).

  5. comment
    Comment #2084082

    No this is what a GPL developer considers a "loss". Specifically, yet another demonstration of why developing for someone else's walled garden is a bad idea.

  6. comment
    Comment #2063921

    I'm not sure that Haskell could, given time, subsume dynamically typed programming. But even if it is possible, why would it be desirable? Most Haskell people don't think very high…

  7. comment
    Comment #2032395

    Icaza has a long history of being a microsoft shill, I can't say I'm suprised to see him leap to his master's defence once again.

  8. comment
    Comment #1976810

    The confusion about the use case of NoSQL probably stems from the term "NoSQL" being so vaguely defined. All you can say for sure about one is that it's not relational. But other t…

  9. comment
    Comment #1935796

    Remember, you can also use any language that compiles to Java bytecode on a JVM. A short list includes Scala, Clojure, Ruby, Python, Groovy and even Javascript(via Rhino). So the J…

  10. story
  11. comment
    Comment #1727990

    There is also the matter that the whole "correctness vs. productivity" debate is a false opposite. There is nothing mutually contradictive with correctness and productivity, so the…

  12. comment
    Comment #1727965

    Of course human error applies here too; But it's much simpler to get one type right than to use the type in the right way everywhere. Per example: The Red-Black-Tree implementation…

  13. comment
  14. comment
    Comment #1641652

    It's amusing watching the author use purple prose over a single blinking LED. I bet if Steve Jobs gave him a turd he would describe it as "that which makes the flowers grow, with a…

  15. comment
    Comment #1272006

    It continues to amaze me how many and adamant apple's apologists are. Stockholm syndrome?

  16. comment
    Comment #1187781

    Let's assume that the author is right when he says that all companies ignore linux. What would make that such a big disaster? Is there some specific proprietary app that _needs_ to…

  17. comment
    Comment #1143406

    I'm not sure i agree with graham on this one. Certainly it's useful and necessary to keep some brevity, however his jab at design patterns is a schoolbook false opposite (if you do…

  18. comment
    Comment #1101525

    To me the really interesting question is how Microsoft ever got to be a monopoly in the first place, with the kind of products they've been making. What made windows and office suc…

  19. comment
    Comment #1086334

    I disagree with the main premise: That as long as you provide the "90% functionality" (i.e mail,chat e.t.c), no casual user will miss the last 10%. Sure, most of the time this will…

  20. comment
    Comment #1086251

    Several problems with this article: 1: Critique against mouse and keyboard rings hollow. It's stuck around so far because it "just works" for a large number of apps. Touchscreens n…

  21. story
  22. story
  23. story
  24. story
  25. story