Viewing profile — voidhorse
voidhorse
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 03, 2015, 9:22 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,529
- Public activity
- 985 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About voidhorse
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49237683
The "Socratic Method" (aka maieutic) skills annoy me, precisely because when you read them they are the kind of low-effort, low-expertise crap someone who over relies on AI would n…
-
comment
Comment #49237640
This. This is exactly how I use them and I have had no issues so far. I read the book myself, then I point the LLM at it to ask questions about notions I might be struggling with.
-
comment
Comment #49210108
Ugh, you're right! I read too quickly. Please disregard me OP. I'll leave the comment here just in case it clarifies things for poor readers such as myself lol.
-
comment
Comment #49210097
I would say start with software architecture books for large or highly distributed systems. This will get you thinking beyond code level to system component level with subject matt…
-
comment
Comment #49205111
So, while it's true that your runs with high speed and distance when both are considered are Pareto points, your max speed run and max distance run overall are also Pareto points. …
-
comment
Comment #49196663
Yes, the difference between coding (writing software) and engineering (making informed trade offs about system design) is effectively bound up in analyses like those supported by c…
-
comment
Comment #49196377
One nuance that people sometimes miss is that pareto optimality in the continuous case and discrete case are distinct. Using continuous case algorithms on discrete feasible set opt…
-
comment
Comment #49161757
I don't think it's possible to eliminate cognitive debt when using LLMs, but you can definitely minimize it. Part of this means recognizing that you will only get, say, a 2x produc…
-
comment
Comment #49141416
#3 just means the person is going to stop asking you when they realize that: a. You bring no expertise beyond asking an LLm for the answer. b. They can just do that themselves. If …
-
comment
Comment #49141387
I think there is a clear distinction to make in the case of communications. Yes, if you are writing a longer piece of communication and you just verbatim ship whatever the LLM spit…
-
comment
Comment #49141341
Pragmatically, the range of application for a fuzzer and for an LLM are so widely different that I'm not sure it makes any kind of pragmatic sense to compare the two. Also, I don't…
-
comment
Comment #49141305
I completely agree. All crediting LLMs does is give the companies that built them precisely the kind of ego stroking feedback they want. I bet Dario giggles with excitement every t…
-
comment
Comment #49141275
I don't have a problem with Diataxis itself but every time it comes up it saddens me because it is a reminder of how bad the technical writing community (by which, here I mean peop…
-
comment
Comment #49036840
Yeah, this letter is just proof of (the by now long standing fact) of corporate power/corporate capture of American governance. Tons of popular protests against big AI? Makes no di…
-
comment
Comment #48985323
Yes because the keystrokes aren't free and the world is finite. We need to pay these monkeys in bananas.
-
comment
Comment #48969182
Probably because claude suggested some kind of wack react based setup early on (because react dominates the training data) and it's be blasphemy worthy of termination for the Anthr…
-
comment
Comment #48937907
> to be more specific, i'd argue LLMs “understand” awfully similarly to a brilliant (polymath) with early dementia or Alzheimer' At which point i'd argue that you're kind of refuti…
-
comment
Comment #48920230
I'm really starting to tire of people making broad, general claims about how LLMs work or how to use them with N = 1 or 2. An LLM is a statistics machine for goodness sake. Basical…
-
comment
Comment #48906529
I don't know enough about the quantum level to really understand whether or not that would change my view of things. From Shannon's theory, it's abundantly clear that "information"…
-
comment
Comment #48886566
What a stupid list. Heavily biased. I'd just like to point out that a large bulk of these papers depend on the existence of the computer and yet Alan Turing is not even on the list…
-
comment
Comment #48880462
You are missing the point. Let me use "fabulashinaism" which is a theory I just made up that posits that the universe is made up of little gnomes called atoms. There is a sense in …
-
comment
Comment #48880364
Let me try again. We use miles to measure distance. Hopefully you agree with me that, miles, being a system of measurement to express relationships of distance, have no ontological…
-
comment
Comment #48872708
At a glance, this seems heavily recency-biased and not adjusted for inflation. I would expect a lot of other names that predate the 21st century to be on the list. The methodology …
-
comment
Comment #48872600
Yeah, but my point is that "information" is not really a substantive concept. It is an abstraction. It is a useful technical tool. For the record, I am a nominalist when it comes t…
-
comment
Comment #48872549
Sure, others would also claim the "financial view" of the universe has also provided insight. That doesn't mean I go around claiming the money is some fundamental universal substan…