Viewing profile — vladdanilov
vladdanilov
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Oct 08, 2013, 5:24 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 699
- Public activity
- 120 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About vladdanilov
Projects: https://optimage.app https://designplugins.com
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #21919780
Squoosh does not use best-in-class codecs [1]. Lossless PNG compression is 5-15% worse on average and lossy PNG compression (color quantization) is limited to PNG-8, which is not e…
-
comment
Comment #21185697
This describes the problem more or less but it does not give a single working solution. Image optimization now includes videos, scaling, format and color conversion, and simply com…
-
comment
Comment #20869372
The website assets are optimized in a rather strange way. The total page weight of ~20MB is huge for mobile. The images are heavily compressed using WebP lossy with quite noticeabl…
-
comment
Comment #19477346
> For high quality photography purposes jpeg is bordering on useless > Use WebP! For everything! Jyrki Alakuijala, one of the creators of WebP, on WebP vs JPEG [1]: >> For high qua…
-
comment
Comment #19476688
> 56% larger than those created by ImageOptim! And noticeably degraded if you compare those images with the originals. Optimage does apply chroma subsampling, the major winner here…
-
comment
Comment #19475473
I have been making Optimage which is currently the only tool that can automatically optimize images without ruining visual quality [1]. It is also the new state of the art in lossl…
-
comment
Comment #18680682
> Omvlee decided to design his application to run natively on OS X. This was very smart. Although Omvlee could have reached a considerably wider audience by designing Sketch for Wi…
-
comment
Comment #18338010
I specifically meant automatic lossy compression with predictable visual quality. If ImageOptim could actually achieve it (automatically), that would save me and others an awful lo…
-
comment
Comment #18335534
> Compress your JPG images with the compression level of 70‑80. In practice some images can get noticeable artifacts even at around 90. Most of JPEG compressors always apply chroma…
-
comment
Comment #18286596
It's alright. There's a 77 KB spinner.gif that can be reduced by half.
-
comment
Comment #18265687
> imageoptim clocking in at around half the total filesize of optimage Only that ImageOptim ruined most of JPEG images while PNG images are ~7.5% bigger. > imageoptim is dramatical…
-
comment
Comment #18265507
Well, the problem is the uncanny valley between native and its imitation.
-
comment
Comment #18262357
Qt does not use native widgets only simulates them.
-
comment
Comment #18262203
Yes, some of the source images are tagged with ICC color profiles. It looks like Firefox still does not treat untagged images as sRGB and the difference on wide-gamut monitors may …
-
comment
Comment #18262099
Why? There's an extensive benchmark [1], also seen on the homepage, that proves it is the first tool that does not break images like other state-of-the-art tools, i.e. fits the sub…
-
comment
Comment #18255811
I plan to release a cross-platform CLI tool first. The core tool already works under *nix. But there's still a good portion of business logic in the app. The work on a cross-platfo…
-
comment
Comment #18254995
I find the irony in more prosaic details like a 2.1MB image [1] to show the new UI of "Secure, Fast & Private Web Browser" (for comparison optimized PNG8 is 351KB [2] and JPEG is 3…
- story
-
comment
Comment #18236912
JPEG is not a good choice for UI/typography screenshots. There are ~1MB of JPEGs at quality 50 on the page. By using PNG8 not only you can halve that size but also preserve origina…
-
comment
Comment #18154590
WebP lossy and WebP lossless often get mixed up. They are substantially different. While the former is mostly just outdated VP8 4:2:0, it is fast and more pleasing to the eye than …
-
comment
Comment #18032904
You will get better results by swapping the two. Pngquant stops at color quantization. Also, most of those savings came from near-optimal Deflate compression.
-
comment
Comment #18031658
Nice to see you're using the same animation technique [1]. MP4 could not possibly provide this level of quality/size (~150KB per animation). Pngcrush is rather limiting though. I c…
- story
- comment
-
comment
Comment #17557364
Why is it not a browser feature? Transferred 175MB just to measure the speed. Good it does not do it at 3G speeds. There are also 156KB of images waiting to be compressed to one th…