Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — vince14

vince14

HN member
Joined
Wed, Aug 05, 2015, 6:02 PM UTC
HN karma
96
Public activity
45 items

About vince14

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48404338

    > and energy storage What do you think this means? It doesn't mean what you think it means. Quoting LCOE and ignoring system costs disqualifies you for any discussion on this topic…

  2. comment
    Comment #48072949

    Isn't the jitterBufferTarget [0] the latency vs. quality knob? [0] https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/RTCRtpRecei...

  3. comment
    Comment #47965420

    That is not the case. There are LCOLC, LFSCOE and others which land on renewables being way more expensive. Even without your made up claim about "assuming cheap and fast to build …

  4. comment
    Comment #47964681

    Storage is not just 'a problem', it doesn't exist and won't for many many decades. The planned solution is hydrogen power plants, but no one wants to build them because the infrast…

  5. comment
    Comment #45126574

    Their fetch call is missing `keepalive: true`. When set to true, the browser will not abort the associated request if the page that initiated it is unloaded before the request is c…

  6. comment
    Comment #43690358

    Because projects like these were missing back then, I got creative with nginx and do not need any config changes to serve new projects: server { listen 80; server_name ~^(? \w+)(\.…

  7. comment
    Comment #43286319

    I'm having the same issue. https://securitytrails.com/ also had my "secret" staging subdomain. I made a catch-all certificate, so the subdomain didn't show up in CT logs. It's stil…

  8. comment
    Comment #40767301

    Fire-and-forget?

  9. comment
    Comment #35980237

    https://gdpr-info.eu/recitals/no-49/ > Network and Information Security as Overriding Legitimate Interest > stopping ‘denial of service’ attacks Storing logs with IPs is no problem…

  10. comment
    Comment #31930095

    Creating clips from tv recordings: ffmpeg -ss 01:59:00.000 -i "interlaced.ts" -ss 00:00:12.000 -t 26 -max_muxing_queue_size 1024 -c:a libopus -b:a 96k -c:v libx264 -crf 20 -vf "yad…

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #29632634

    > Introduced arbitrary code execution via ${jndi:ldap://... inside any logged string. hehe

  13. comment
    Comment #29508772

    Me too, that's why I always have `html { overflow-y: scroll; }`.

  14. comment
    Comment #28729318

    > no threads > node does not have a concurrency and parallelism story > standard library is tiny Also claims like "async makes your program more difficult to reason about" without …

  15. comment
    Comment #28729038

    I think many people feel threatened by the success and the pace of the Node.js ecosystem. Most arguments, even in this thread already, are just wrong. Obviously they have never had…

  16. comment
    Comment #28017350

    What actually happened to Namecoin? It's been a decade since I last heard from it.

  17. comment
    Comment #27984411

    With the rotating IPv4 you at least have the possibility to make yourself more anonymous. IPv6 takes that decision away from you. > You would probably have the same level of reliab…

  18. comment
    Comment #27983857

    This enables to track users not only across websites but across the entire internet. It wouldn't surprise me if there are already databases which map IPv6 subnets to real names, ad…

  19. comment
    Comment #27983667

    The problem I have is that IPv6 is unusable right now. Most server software cannot properly handle blocking of increasing IPv6 subnets. And not only that, but my ISP assigns the sa…

  20. comment
    Comment #27708784

    Custom domains and cloud storage are €3/month. Not included in €1/month.

  21. comment
    Comment #27501313

    > Sorry Jeff, but your post from today is simply stupid. > Think only about the embedded programming… do you really think that you can create a web app to control your washer? > Or…

  22. comment
    Comment #27219539

    Because they can't read and are missing a module.

  23. comment
    Comment #27013745

    https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=25497357

  24. comment
    Comment #26796846

    You left out the part which contradicts your claim. > Don't send the Referer header to less secure destinations (HTTPS→HTTP). The referer header is still sent from HTTPS to HTTPS.

  25. comment
    Comment #26793010

    The destination site still receives the referrer header, sent by your browser via HTTPS. Further measures are needed like this one.