Viewing profile — viivaux
viivaux
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jan 01, 2019, 5:35 PM UTC
- HN karma
- -14
- Public activity
- 69 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About viivaux
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #20995097
This forum is absolutely fucking infested.
-
comment
Comment #20248403
I wouldn't say :the most: demanding, but I'd enjoy hearing what you think is easy about driving some of the fastest land vehicles ever created vs the best drivers in the world, wit…
-
comment
Comment #20208693
I wonder - do HN rules prevent people from pointing out suspicious accounts even when the user's name is a balls-out reference to shilling? Am I allowed to reference other comments…
-
comment
Comment #20188347
Is your shtick to act unsurprised at things? There's more going on here than compound interest friendo, this is not the time for acting suave and ignorant.
-
comment
Comment #20188326
> The author wants you to imagine a bunch of rich people getting more and more money, and poorer people getting less and less There is no language in the article to justify this st…
-
comment
Comment #20009223
> There is no way they would charge him if they didn't think it could stand up under the first amendment. Your comment reminds me of this one from 2012, spoken with utter confidenc…
-
comment
Comment #19966571
Antisemitism? Show me the most antisemitic thing Corbyn has ever done. These slurs on his character are spread by newspapers and TV but when you look into them there's nothing ther…
-
comment
Comment #19966049
An online poll. Huh. What did I 'call him' that you disagree with?
-
comment
Comment #19965061
Are you talking about Corbyn? The guy with broad support despite an unremitting smear campaign from every single corner of the media from The Grauniad to the Beeb, never mind the t…
-
comment
Comment #19908873
Wasn't a personal attack - it was a statement of fact. Please learn the difference.
-
comment
Comment #19901872
There are links to primary evidence and unbiased sources throughout. It's absolutely riddled with them, as this thread is with people like you. So, you're welcome. Except, from you…
-
comment
Comment #19898582
For anyone interested, here are the actual facts surrounding this case. https://justice4assange.com/note-to-editors-sweden.html The way media has "covered" this, it is not all that…
-
comment
Comment #19898356
Seconded. Meanwhile, there has been a simultaneous attack on outlets that might actually spit the truth out there: the recent "changes to Facebook's algorithm" resulting in outlets…
-
comment
Comment #19817168
>therefore Not really. In a whole number of ways. I actually have no idea how you can say this with any honesty. I mean, are you really arguing that national identity is the major …
-
comment
Comment #19787134
> "The lack of transparency around new policing tools such as mobile phone extraction is a serious cause for concern. There are no records, no statistics, no safeguards, no oversig…
-
comment
Comment #19707752
>I think that my stand on this issue should be respected. But I don't think it's remotely worthy of respect. You want to live in a society like that, go somewhere with no public sc…
-
comment
Comment #19656486
If Apple wants to do business in one country in a way that upsets people in another country, then they have to face the consequences of that contagion. I honestly don't know what y…
-
comment
Comment #19655784
Seems everything I want to say here is likely to end up as [flagged]. If only I wanted to cast vague and unsubstantiated aspersions; then I'd be fine.
-
comment
Comment #19655766
Would you mind telling me the gist of his comment? Was there a good reason for flagging it? I could have sworn that you used to be able to still read [flagged] comments here. When …
-
comment
Comment #19640190
There is much more objectionable content in the original post.
-
comment
Comment #19640178
I dislike this comment so, so much. > I use to go back and forth on Julian, If there is some reason I should care about your perspective, you've certainly not shown it here. The ex…
-
comment
Comment #19611377
Except, I wasn't creating arbitrary unfounded discourse, or attacking one side or another; but questioning the idea that the guys supposed to remove the President if he lingers can…
-
comment
Comment #19610097
Article states James M. Murray, a "career member" of the Secret Service, will take over. He was head of the Washington field office when Guccifer was announced to have been identif…
- story
-
comment
Comment #19588107
You blame the students for a program which was designed to give away 700 million, but instead gave away a 70th of that - while rejecting 97-99% of applicants so far? This at a time…