Viewing profile — vigna
vigna
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 12, 2014, 6:07 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 9
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About vigna
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #42272892
Hi SideQuark. I'm writing you here as there's no contact email on your profile--I wanted to ask you if you ever tried a SAT solver on RomuTrio to find cycles (or you can give me so…
-
comment
Comment #35337463
All the images you are seeing were generated without any human intervention—it's just two AIs talking to each other.
- story
-
comment
Comment #35127700
Note that some smart people in Karlsruhe developed a highly parallel construction procedure for RecSplit, so now you can build large low-space maps very quickly. https://arxiv.org/…
-
comment
Comment #35127665
That stuff is implemented in Java by the Sux4J project ( https://sux4j.di.unimi.it/ ). Happy to see this is getting into mainstream (I am the proud inventor of the name "static fun…
-
comment
Comment #35101151
Ha ha it's fun to be defined "a professor from Italy". Probably for most people in this community I'm the designer of the JavaScript PRNG (V8, Node.js, Chrome, Firefox, etc.) or th…
-
story
PCG generators are easily “crackable”
Melissa O'Neill's PCG generators are LCGs/MCGs with power-of-two moduli over which some scrambling is applied. The author has claimed that while not fully cryptographic PRNGs, pred…
-
comment
Comment #15124239
There's a complete theory based on primitive polynomials on Z/2Z. Check any article on linear PRNGs for references. "Experimentally" will work only with ridiculously small state sp…
-
comment
Comment #14210130
I don't how this project ended up here in this moment, but as one of the authors let me answer the main questions. 1) The name is just a coincidence. I learned originally about ind…
-
comment
Comment #10570493
It's just a matter of misconfigured terminal databases. I wrote some years ago a Linux Mini-HOWTO about it, I wonder where it is now...
-
comment
Comment #10570485
Nah, come on, ne is obviously better! :-P
- story