Viewing profile — vighneshiyer
vighneshiyer
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Sep 27, 2024, 5:58 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 153
- Public activity
- 8 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About vighneshiyer
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #43988939
Here is the relevant bit from their whitepaper ( https://storage.googleapis.com/deepmind-media/DeepMind.com/B... ): > AlphaEvolve was able to find a simple code rewrite (within an …
-
comment
Comment #42290484
Existing mixed-placement algorithms depend on hyperparameters, heuristics, and initial states / randomness. If afforded more compute resources, they can explore a much wider space …
-
comment
Comment #42290442
Cadence in particular has been quite receptive to allowing academics and researchers to benchmark new algorithms against their tools. They have also been quite permissive with lett…
-
comment
Comment #42287148
So I'm not sure what Google is referring to here. As you can see in the ISPD paper ( https://vlsicad.ucsd.edu/Publications/Conferences/396/c396.p... ) on page 5, they openly compar…
-
comment
Comment #42286814
> One key argument in the rebuttal against the ISPD article is that the resources used in their comparison were significantly smaller. To me, this point alone seems sufficient to q…
-
comment
Comment #42286702
You are correct. For commercial use, the GPUs used for training and fine-tuning aren't a problem financially. However, if we wanted to rigorously benchmark AlphaChip against simula…
-
comment
Comment #42285810
I have published an addendum to an article I wrote about AlphaChip ( https://vighneshiyer.com/misc/ml-for-placement/ ) at the very bottom that addresses this rebuttal from Google a…
-
comment
Comment #41673769
This work from Google (original Nature paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-03544-w ) has been credibly criticized by several researchers in the EDA CAD discipline. Th…