Viewing profile — veselin
veselin
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Sep 23, 2013, 7:30 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 374
- Public activity
- 113 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About veselin
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48711028
Here, it appears they compare a single prompt "find IDOR", against a multi-agent system. However, one can also start far more sophisticated skills that spin up subagents and mostly…
-
comment
Comment #48684271
The more I think on the problem, the more I believe this will be solved with US interventions. And the interventions will increase inflation by a lot, so prices will not go down. T…
-
comment
Comment #48375520
Claude code itself spins a lot of its subagents with Haiku. The model has low hallucination rate, so it is great for exploration tasks. I guess this is what the best purpose of thi…
-
comment
Comment #48270803
I would argue that with AI, this becomes less of an issue. Connect N services, deploy to bare metal. Granted, AI is an additional cost now local or remote. But so is the MacBook pe…
-
comment
Comment #48198554
Exactly our experience too. Effectively we catch these and on these status codes, we send to OpenAI. Retrying the same query in Gemini has high chance to give kind-of the same stat…
-
comment
Comment #47659148
I think this is a promise, probably also for spec driven development. You write the spec, the whole thing can be reimplemented in rust tomorrow. Make small modules or libraries. On…
-
comment
Comment #47648409
This is an experiment that, although not to this extreme, was tested by OpenAI. Their responses API allow you to control verbosity: https://developers.openai.com/api/reference/reso…
-
comment
Comment #47333705
I guess we will have a lot more benefits if we can get this to work on something like llama.cpp - since it really has a lot of kernels for different quantizations, a lot of home us…
-
comment
Comment #47127400
I think they put two things: * Likely they will seek regulation that would ban some models. Not sure this can work, but they will certainly try. * Likely they will not release some…
-
comment
Comment #47077009
I am actually going to complain about this: that neither of the Gemini models are not preview ones. Anthropic seems the best in this. Everything is in the API on day one. OpenAI te…
-
comment
Comment #46684304
What is the state of using quants? For chat models, a few errors or lost intelligence may matter a little. But what is happening to tool calling in coding agents? Does it fail cata…
-
comment
Comment #46566630
I am taking for SWE bench style problems where Todo doesn't help, except for more parallelism.
-
comment
Comment #46550802
I run evals and the Todo tool doesn't help most of the time. Usually models on high thinking would maintain Todo/state in their thinking tokens. What Todo helps is for cases like A…
-
comment
Comment #45966723
I work a lot on testing also SWE bench verified. This benchmark in my opinion now is good to catch if you got some regression on the agent side. However, going above 75%, it is lik…
-
comment
Comment #44657768
Anybody knows if one can find an inference provider that offers input token caching? It should be almost required for agentic use - first speed, but also almost all conversations s…
-
comment
Comment #44445424
I think that people are just too quick to assume this is amazing, before it is there. Which doesn't mean it won't get there. Somehow if I take the best models and agents, most hard…
-
comment
Comment #43534458
I noticed a similar trends in selling on X. Put a claim, peg on some product A with good sales - Cursor, Claude, Gemini, etc. Then say, the best way to use A is with our best produ…
-
comment
Comment #42452290
Yes. The article is click bait. With such a title I would have expected majority of the area to be dummy, but it is just structurally more silicon, exactly like a picture may be ma…
-
comment
Comment #39966631
I used them both. I ended up disabling copilot. The reason is that the completions do not always integrate with the rest of the code, in particular with non-matching brackets. Ofte…
-
comment
Comment #39951233
It seems recent years give us a lot of licenses (for core infra software) and now for LLMs. They all say in very legalese basically: these top 5-10 tech companies will not compete …
-
comment
Comment #39921299
When I saw the name, I knew immediately this is Jyrki's work.
-
comment
Comment #39882365
Exactly. The whole thing reads like some propaganda. It pits interesting topics ahead then to move on and push some agenda that sounds super political to me. Yes, some languages ar…
-
comment
Comment #39741063
I think this is simply the default of lm-evaluation-harness. They said they ran every single benchmark they could out of the box.
-
comment
Comment #39055492
The product they often presented as started in 20% time is Google news. I don't know the actual details, just this is what I remember from my time at Google (2006-2012).
-
comment
Comment #36278608
It is true that nobody competes in the low power high efficiency workstation market or maybe such a market does not exist yet and Apple is creating it. But also as users, some were…