Viewing profile — veraEFF
veraEFF
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Sep 24, 2015, 10:39 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 31
- Public activity
- 5 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About veraEFF
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #10275477
Yes, the problem is for whether 1 is allowed or not -- do you infringe if integer includes 1? The point of the article is to show how words--even words with very well understood me…
-
comment
Comment #10275412
Yes, as you'll see in the post, we note that patent owners can redefine words, and that's ok. But where the issue comes up is if that's not clear. Patents are supposed to put peopl…
-
comment
Comment #10275380
In a patent, what matters are the claims at the end. These are what defines what the inventor claims to have a right to exclude others from doing. If a patent claim covers X, Y, or…
-
comment
Comment #10275335
hi there! no intentional mischaracterization at all. I posted below but I'll mention it again. The patent owner actually originally, at the outset of the litigation, included "1" i…
-
comment
Comment #10275286
Hey there, Thanks for the comment. While I agree that the negatives and zero would not make sense, the interesting case is "1" in particular. Although it's not in the post, the pat…