Viewing profile — vectorjohn
vectorjohn
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Jan 27, 2012, 1:54 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 545
- Public activity
- 405 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About vectorjohn
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #26144467
I've actually been using this since the year started, and it helps you have clear fitness goals more than anything else I've tried before.
-
comment
Comment #15321090
Yes, that's exactly the point. It disarms people from fighting over patent nonsense. If you hate software patents you should love the bad + patents license.
-
comment
Comment #14757980
What is it that makes solar panels cost what they do, ultimately? Not materials, right? Those are all basically sand and other not so special things. Labor? Isn't it mostly automat…
-
comment
Comment #14757901
I think it would be much easier to use methane. Just as carbon neutral if you make it yourself, and doesn't have as many exotic engineering requirements. I didn't know that about f…
-
comment
Comment #14533094
Also, any doctor will tell you that.
-
comment
Comment #14036794
Even buses don't take you door to door. I can't imagine a future where a streetcar is anywhere near as good as self driving cars (possibly paired with mass transit).
-
comment
Comment #14033197
I really want to be in the business of writing the software that plans these things. The possibilities are crazy. Predicting where to have cars based on overall traffic flows, havi…
-
comment
Comment #14029408
Cabs are expensive, relatively slow, and busses are just slow and don't take you to your destination. Really, this doesn't seem like much of a stretch.
-
comment
Comment #14029280
Those aren't congesting city streets, at least that I've ever seen.
-
comment
Comment #14029279
Uh, what? Cabs are already really popular. Why would a self driving car be "from hell"? You think they can't be cleaned?
-
comment
Comment #14029272
I think car sharing even works in those cases. It's all a logistical problem. Not that there won't be some people who own cars. There just aren't that many problems that are hard t…
-
comment
Comment #14029262
Driverless cars can take you between train stations and destinations. No magical form of train will come to your house or go to your office. In fact, this is a perfect use case for…
-
comment
Comment #14029249
Wow, so for the short time you have kids in diapers this won't work for you personally. Big whoop. We still have typewriters around too, and some people ride horses. Old tech doesn…
-
comment
Comment #14029236
Give it a rest. There is no possible way he can solve it right now, we don't have self driving cars yet.
-
comment
Comment #14029228
"A teenager doesn't just "want a car." He wants that freedom that car gives him." Precisely, and this is why owning the car isn't that important. This teenager presumably still has…
-
comment
Comment #14029168
You missed the point like the GP. None of those services are anything like what's coming. Car2go still has to be parked, has to be close, you have to live in the home zone. Zip car…
-
comment
Comment #13922498
The fear of battery degradation is way way overblown. You'll drive at least a few hundred thousand miles before you might "need" to replace it [1]. And even then, you could keep go…
-
comment
Comment #13739548
I like the response peer review or STFU. Maybe PRoSTFU. What is that technique the fake-reasonable argument makers use? It's like a Gish gallop but slower. Maybe that's the best de…
-
comment
Comment #13672865
How is that your take? It seems that would completely contradict it. If it's just accumulation of errors how would that be impacted at all by what you eat? Especially the age of wh…
-
comment
Comment #13590087
Privacy has literally no tangible value to most people. It's just a warm fuzzy to a few, and a practical value to even fewer. Convenience on the other hand has obvious value to alm…
-
comment
Comment #13292791
Well good for you, but you don't speak for everyone.
-
comment
Comment #13247094
Doesn't seem like a problem. The fake outrage about it is laughable. This is no different than any other kind of personal interview. They want to see evidence that you're a normal …
-
comment
Comment #13246866
But again, why would it be bad if that "flagged" you? It's not like any of this sends you straight to jail or something. You should be investigated further if there is some signal …
-
comment
Comment #13245632
Some of us don't see it as a problem if random people entering the country get their public tweets investigated. Why on earth wouldn't this be a good thing?
-
comment
Comment #13245557
It's not like they have a time machine to go pick up old evidence. They had an old sheet, it's easy to imagine how there wouldn't be DNA left there.