Viewing profile — vb-8448

Non necessarily, they can easily increase market share by staying where they are.

Why? It's open weight, there are plenty providers on open router that are serving the latest v4 flash at 0.14/0.28 $.

what's wrong nowadays w/ django?

> The typical rigid workflow low code approach quickly hits the limit when it comes to complexity. IMO rigid workflows guarantee deterministic and auditable behaviour. It's extreme…

What about criminal implications? PS: i guess the insurance on self diving cars is a little bit different and the accident rate is only part of the picture. Just an example: humans…

I'm just curious how it works on the legal side: if a human run the red light he gets a fine, who gets fined with a waymo car? If the car I'm in cause a big damage or kill someone?…

It's on a completely different level now.

Based on personal observation, a lot of productivity has been thrown out of the window with unneeded refactoring, rewrites and "what-if" scenarios that the AI agent will spot.

It's curious that all images are front facing ... although, for a habsburg jaw, a profile or 3/4 profile picture would be better.

Not a big fan of vanilla tailwindcss too, but (from the perspective of someone that needs the job done) "just use modern CSS" as the author suggest is even worse.

Can someone explain to an ignorant what kind of advancement these recent AI results enabled, if any.

> Have not heard that yet, since a big part of HTMX is manipulating the DOM and binding events. I'm pretty sure this is not correct Did you ever open the htmx home page? Because it…

If I have to build something that is basically logic on backend, forms, tables, some static pages, some interactivity here and there(btw is what most of the sites and web apps out …

> HTMX team should build a game with it. Load some 3D in WebGL/WebGPU, showcase high performance UI. Why? Why you'd pick htmx (or even reactjs?!?) to build a game?

Timing is the key: if the burst happens, let's say, in the next 12-18 months apple is very well positioned, but every month without the bubble popping add pressure on apples execut…

GPT hacked the competition?

Who is in the best position and has the necessary knowledge to make this kind of evaluation? Who is trying to define what is "too dangerous" or "not too dangerous"?

"we have not and are not advocating for a ban on open-weights models" but we want to decide if a model can be released or not and who in the world can build these models ...

I wasn't saying it isn't useful, I was saying that you cannot infer even the marginal cost of closed models. The K3 maths can turn true only if the models size is roughly the same …

Just out of curiosity, based on what we know for sure they(OAI+A) make money on pure inference and lose on inference+training?

Only if you assume that at some point, for any reason, there will be "the model" that doesn't need costly retraining. I guess this is one of the reason Anthropic i so "active" for …

> Which is by far the most interesting number of the two. Only if you don't have to continuously train new models, and you are not at a runway risk.

> Then we'll be able to guesstimate if "labs are subsidising tokens on API pricing". No, you don't. Without training cost you can infer only the marginal cost of serving this kind …

It doesn't matter who owns the debt, if the debt won't be repaid or refinanced a big black hole on someone's balance sheet of >1.65T will materialize! The consequences could be unp…

Maybe it's silly, but from someone who is ignorant on this topics, what are the consequences of this kind of "discoveries"? Is it something "revolutionary" or just another small br…