Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — vatsachak

vatsachak

HN member
Joined
Wed, Nov 05, 2025, 10:53 PM UTC
HN karma
478
Public activity
266 items

About vatsachak

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49223034

    Something like Windows can't even keep it's cool on my lunar lake 32 GB laptop while NixOS with Niri works great on an 8GB guy

  2. comment
    Comment #49223006

    Tesla is a trillion dollar company because it's a meme stock. It has a 300 P/E

  3. comment
    Comment #49204514

    Yeah. But this kinda feels like a bandaid. Eventually someone will have to solve compute in memory at scale.

  4. comment
    Comment #49192948

    Okay then why do software engineers still exist. And if companies are making an error keeping people on instead of LLMs, why isn't there an all agent company making money off of it…

  5. comment
    Comment #49183562

    Okay here's something LLMs can't. They can't solve problems that are longer than ~10 pages of math. They also can't maintain codebases without supervision. It's because they are ha…

  6. comment
    Comment #49183322

    Because pattern recognition and deduction is automatable and LLMs are superhuman at low depth high depth problems. Next

  7. comment
    Comment #49164813

    The LLM knows how to solve problems in any way you want. This is not a good thing

  8. comment
    Comment #49164804

    What makes you think that they will get good at driving themselves? Can they now train on their own outputs? Doesn't seem like it

  9. comment
    Comment #49163492

    Well the difficult part is finding a good intermediate representation, which they did

  10. comment
    Comment #49137370

    And everyone who's been into this stuff for a while has had their prediction come through. If AI is water, Lean is the pipe and collatz is a clog on one end, then surely we'll find…

  11. comment
    Comment #49124512

    Awesome! Confirms what we know; LLMs are superhuman at short term reasoning and breadth

  12. comment
    Comment #49093196

    I think that a gpt 5.6 level model might sustain the growth. We're seeing talented users squeeze non trivial math and code out these tiers of models.

  13. comment
    Comment #49084277

    Hi, used to be actual mathematician here (lecturer, publication in JEMS and all that) For starters he's talking about how peer review is bad because of politics. That's fair. But n…

  14. comment
    Comment #49084201

    I need to make the same post when someone finally RLs an LLM to get really good at performance engineering. Many "serious" performance engineers are aghast "Nooo the r00b0t can't m…

  15. comment
    Comment #49070981

    Have you tried giving them the types you want and then have them auto complete? They are pretty good at a auto completing abstractions

  16. comment
    Comment #49070755

    Video models can certainly predict what stirring cream into coffee does. Most LLMs these days are limited by context, and within context they are super human at reasoning tasks/per…

  17. comment
    Comment #49070703

    You're right, forgot a factor of 10 whoops

  18. comment
    Comment #49065081

    Worse than 0.01% of humans means that there are 8,000,000 people better than it. I know that's being pedantic I understand what you're saying. But every time I use Codex unless I s…

  19. comment
    Comment #49063710

    Yeah computer proof writing involves choosing good abstractions at every turn. LLMs aren't great at that yet

  20. comment
    Comment #49053565

    I doubt anything other than an LLM auto complete could add something like a tensor reshape

  21. comment
    Comment #49052422

    Yep! I do use Codex CLI

  22. comment
    Comment #49052134

    I disagree. I speak in code to the LLMs. It's just that LLMs are really good at reinventing the wheel that you were supposed to in your codebase. Recent example. struct TensorView …

  23. comment
    Comment #49050991

    I hate saying this but unironically opus 5/gpt 5.6 are writing maintainable code on the order of 500-1000 lines

  24. comment
  25. comment