Viewing profile — vadman97
vadman97
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Aug 04, 2022, 4:38 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 151
- Public activity
- 72 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About vadman97
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- story
-
comment
Comment #41727206
If there was only one alert criteria, that'd be simple. Our alerts can be configured for any data filters (eg. only matching logs with column `level='error'`); we would have to cre…
-
comment
Comment #41727198
We insert from our alerts worker because we want the aggregation to happen per alert (with the aggregated data filtered by the particular alert definition). As each alert is evalua…
- story
-
comment
Comment #40373386
Forget the exact details, but we ran into issues with tuning the two setting you're describing on the Cloud instance (these settings were user level settings that seemed to get res…
-
comment
Comment #40370409
Once we hit >100k inserts per second, async inserts didn't work well for us because we had limited control over the background async insert batching happening on the cluster. The b…
-
comment
Comment #40369350
We do via the OpenTelemetry Elixir SDK (and the Phoenix extension) https://opentelemetry.io/docs/languages/erlang/
-
comment
Comment #40369164
Materialized views can help change the ORDER BY with 0 downtime: * Create a new version of the table with the new ORDER BY. * Create a materialized view that will insert from the o…
-
comment
Comment #40368951
Exploring bloom filter index merges would be an interesting addition. I do wish it were easier to profile merge performance to break down where most of the CPU time is being spent.…
-
comment
Comment #40368896
3 nodes of 120 GiB and 30 vCPU each.
-
comment
Comment #40363184
I see what you did there.
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #39236397
Our browser client would help with tracing what network requests are being made by said apps since it would capture all network requests. However, Shopify may restrict what our bro…
- story
-
comment
Comment #37957484
Hey HN, I'm Vadim, the CTO at highlight.io. We offer session replay to engineering teams and have had a lot of questions around client-side performance. We just published a benchma…
- story
-
comment
Comment #37692601
Presumably, they mean millions of logs a day when saying "millions of events a day", of which some subset corresponds to errors.
-
comment
Comment #37692594
Our errors ingest is quite affordable ( https://www.highlight.io/pricing ) and let's you filter out data you are not interested in ingesting. Our logs ingest is even cheaper becaus…
-
comment
Comment #37683051
Regarding model adaptation, we haven't yet explored a fine-tuned model, but it makes a lot of sense for a given class of errors. For a given code-base that is using highlight, the …
-
comment
Comment #37681695
> Have you looked into finetuning the embedding model to your use case? Not yet, though this is definitely one of the next steps for us. The `gte-large` model we use is trained on …
- story
-
story
Show HN: Using LLMs and Embeddings to classify application errors
Hi Hacker News! We’re Vadim and Chris from Highlight.io [1]. We do web app monitoring and are working on using LLMs/embeddings to add new functionality to our error monitoring prod…
-
comment
Comment #37666388
Agreed, but the argument for causing damage still requires a human actor to execute GPT-4's advice. Should we be censoring LLMs just because we are offended by the output or find i…
- story