Viewing profile — v01
v01
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 18, 2010, 4:01 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About v01
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48968765
This is a small pipeline for reading and searching public X without an X Developer API key. Instead of pay-per-use access to Posts and User content on X we're using Grok Build whic…
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #6831383
Pretty awesome results for step completion, especially the 77% on step with 12 drop downs. "Payback" is a cool idea, being compared to Clint Eastwood after giving a bunch of mundan…
-
comment
Comment #3465485
If you are solely relying on the site to drive your subscriptions - it could use some work.. 1. High-res pics of candy and call to action above the fold. 2. Registration/Membership…
-
comment
Comment #3168925
Saying "you could always" for something like this doesn't make any sense. To undertake creation of a mapping service with no/little expertise and if the main constraint is approval…
-
comment
Comment #3168910
If it wasn't clear I meant 100mil requests, not $$$. The pricing is fixed for a tier plan. This is no different than deciding which license to acquire for a service. Do you have an…
-
comment
Comment #3165581
There is tiered pricing. Per client basis... with large discounts for large volumes.
-
comment
Comment #3165574
If your company is going to consume large volumes of mapcalls you will definitely need the tiered pricing which they do offer per client basis. It's possible to get 50% discounts o…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #3112925
One thing I would suggest to all you coders out there... PLEASE place a demo within the post in which you are writing the tutorial. For example big demo button on CodDrops: http://…
-
comment
Comment #3112902
This looks like a circlejerk to me. To summarize: You are a single "founder" who got an "investment" from a single person you pitched to, because he's almost like family. No offenc…
-
comment
Comment #3100981
Why not price it at $999.99? Dumbest novelty app ever.