Viewing profile — user239
user239
HN member- Joined
- Mon, May 04, 2020, 12:23 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 14
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About user239
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #32707730
Is there anything this product has that a tool like codility doesn’t?
-
comment
Comment #32154422
I’m using Azure Cosmos DB, nothing fancy there, simple structure where each message references its parent message id
-
comment
Comment #32154375
Thanks! This is a totally valid feedback. I agree it can get very messy when showing everything by default. Since we have a button to go to next unread message in a discussion that…
-
comment
Comment #32147346
Oh the Apache foundation project? Technically yes, but I guess I never bothered to try using it in its open source form. Given the code complexity, I feel like only Google knew how…
-
comment
Comment #32146273
oh really, well that's quite sad. Thank you for sharing your knowledge. I'm glad at least they let him start it, although I'm curious what their thinking was at that moment (like "…
-
comment
Comment #32141910
I can relate, so I wanted to build something that is more organized. Similar to email, but with all the modern features we have in other tools like chats and online forums. I poste…
-
comment
Comment #32140147
thank you for checking it out! Yes, current version just uses standard bootstrap elements. Wanted to at least make it look not super ugly :) Hopefully I can invest more time in des…
-
story
Show HN: I decided to re-create a mini Google Wave
Even though Wave was killed more than 10 years ago, I didn't fully appreciate its value until recently, when I had to spend a fair amount of time in some group email threads discus…
-
story
Structured email-like discussions – need feedback
I've created a prototype of a system serving the same purpose as email discussions, but working in a more structured and (hopefully) intuitive way. A quick video demonstrating how …
-
comment
Comment #23063124
Is it just me or the logic in #3 is deeply flawed? I mean who of the author’s heroes knew in advance what their companies were going to become (and thus how “special” they were)?