Viewing profile — uselessTA

>AGI research should really be seen as bioweapon, or cloning, or nuclear research. Something strictly regulated worldwide, with export controls for HBM and other hardware used for …

I know some people who are worried at Anthropic, and their position seems to be "if we don't do it, someone even less responsible will. Unilateral disarmament didn't work and real …

>There are people still fighting against evidence of climate change which is less severe... Remains to be seen how severe, and unlike climate change there's a lot more uncertainty.…

The FDA is needed because people will be directly and significantly harmed by bad releases, before we can notice and react Whereas with near-future AI models we can arguably respon…

100%, imo risks from internal deployment will eventually be the biggest risks, and keeping models heavily gated/not accessible just makes these risks much worse.

it didn't because it wasn't released. As soon as it was actually released (chatGPT) it obviously did, so the general point was clearly true

The concern I heard was that releasing it would start an arms race for AGI, which I think it clearly did

Clearly state "we could both verifiably slow down, which you might want to do given that we're ahead & have way more compute. If you don't agree (or defect later), we'll just immed…

Unilateral disarmament doesn't work though. If Anthropic is worried about this, just letting OpenAI win does seem genuinely worse.

The claim I remember was that releasing it would start an arms race for AGI, which was absolutely true

There's an objection here when you get to tiny numbers, but surely you wouldn't get ice cream if there was a 10+% chance to get hit by a car? I think he's saying that >1% or even >…

The claim I remember was that releasing it would start an arms race for AGI, which I think it clearly did