Viewing profile — usaar333
usaar333
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Apr 03, 2008, 1:47 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 4,075
- Public activity
- 1,815 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About usaar333
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49053696
> and eventually AI model will be commodified This axiom not being true (and I'd bet against it) means your overall conclusion is false.
-
comment
Comment #48231831
Tech workers get paid in equity and many in the semiconductor industry are making far far more than this a year with all the equity appreciation.
-
comment
Comment #48149944
How does delaying the release not solve anything? It puts everyone on a notice to fix all security vulnerabilities now
-
comment
Comment #48016456
I hate waiting on hold for 30 minutes even more.
-
comment
Comment #48016455
There's literally a link on the blog post to an article noting they hit $150M ARR.
-
comment
Comment #48016445
Voice agents have capabilities and policy to alter customer state. Just the other day I called into a CC company and the AI waived an interest charge.
-
comment
Comment #47795453
page is updated to state: MCP-Atlas: The Opus 4.6 score has been updated to reflect revised grading methodology from Scale AI.
-
comment
Comment #47736190
> But even setting aside the leaked answers, the scorer’s normalize_str function strips ALL whitespace, ALL punctuation, and lowercases everything before comparison. This means: I …
-
comment
Comment #46956327
True, but it gets you higher accuracy. Gemini had the best aa-omniscience score https://artificialanalysis.ai/evaluations/omniscience
-
comment
Comment #46902793
Openai has; they don't even mention score on gpt-5.3-codex. On the other hand, it is their own verified benchmark, which is telling.
-
comment
Comment #46902501
i'd interpret that as rounding error. that is unchanged swe-bench seems really hard once you are above 80%
-
comment
Comment #46016627
In Quebec it was a 20% jump in mother employment: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-31/affordabl... And had all sorts of negative outcomes for the kids: https://www.e…
-
comment
Comment #45969455
claude 4.5 gets 82% on their own highly customized scaffolding. (parallel compute with a scoring function). That beats Doubao
-
comment
Comment #45454889
That wasn't a ceasefire violation. It was a six week ceasefire that had expired at the beginning of March
-
comment
Comment #45430267
Physics seems better than veo 3 at least from demo videos
-
comment
Comment #45417855
Except it is sublinear. Sonnet 4 was 10.2% above sonnet 3.7 after 3 months.
-
comment
Comment #44831916
No it doesn't. If it were even linear compared to o1 -> o3, we'd be at 2.43 hours. Instead we're only at 2.29. Exponential would be at 3.6 hours
-
comment
Comment #44828550
No, this is below expectations on both Manifold and lesswrong ( https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/FG54euEAesRkSZuJN/ryan_green... ). Median was ~2.75 hours on both (which already rep…
-
comment
Comment #44827226
At this point the prediction for SWE bench (85% by end of this month) is not materializing. We're actually quite far away.
-
comment
Comment #44800664
No obvious gains I feel from quick chats, but too early to tell. These benchmark gains aren't that high, so I doubt it is that obvious.
-
comment
Comment #44790197
> Firstly, if your prior is that every previous startup failed, what does that say about your future chances of success? The prior is the market. It isn't sane to use your own prio…
-
comment
Comment #44786076
Why is modal return so important? You'll work more than 2 jobs
-
comment
Comment #44781598
It's a probabilistic model. It assumes (correctly) that the low probability of a home run times the home run's valuation is quite large ("expected returns" in the probabilistic sen…
-
comment
Comment #44781307
The value of the equity package is 4x higher than the FAANG equivalent equity package (at preferred/market pricing) - that's not the same as saying the shares themselves are worth …
- story