Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — unused0

unused0

HN member
Joined
Sun, Apr 07, 2019, 6:07 PM UTC
HN karma
18
Public activity
24 items

About unused0

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44832224

    Multics ran on Honeywell 6180 and DPS8/M machines. They had 36 bit words like the PDP-10. They also had instructions that would operate o in 6 or 9 bit characters in the word

  2. comment
    Comment #37314030

    The VAX had byte addressable memory, the DPS8/M word 36 bit word addressable, so I suspect that byte oriented instructions might have an edge on the VAX. Contrawise, the DPS8/M mem…

  3. comment
    Comment #37313899

    According to wikipedia, the 6000s ran about 1 MIP and the DPS8/Ms topped out about 1.7 MIPS. Talking with people that worked on Multics, they generally say the 6000s were about 1 M…

  4. comment
    Comment #36718364

    Multics achieved security by building it into the h/w. That caused the h/w to be more expensive and slower. The system market these days is all about price/performance ratio and th…

  5. comment
    Comment #34863473

    IIRC,Primos was written in FORTRAN (with language extensions including the ability to pass a statement number as a parameter, allowing longjmp() like behavior). Multics (as noted a…

  6. comment
    Comment #34523953

    Multics: Security.

  7. comment
    Comment #33429583

    Non-single level stores are copy-on-demand. Typically, a process runs a program by starting with an empty address space and mapping the executable code into that space. The program…

  8. comment
    Comment #33416664

    An FPGA implementation is underway. The X86 segmentation facility resembles Multics segments in name only.

  9. comment
    Comment #33379323

    Run your own Multics: https://multics-wiki.swenson.org/index.php/Main_Page There are also several public access Multics systems up and running.

  10. comment
    Comment #30043303

    The Burroughs system for the B5000 was written in Algol and preceded Multics.

  11. comment
    Comment #28008167

    Multics is written almost entirely in PL/I, plus some assembly for bootup, some messy low level stuff, and time critical bits like process switching. Many additional languages are …

  12. comment
    Comment #25889787

    Multics was co-developed with the hardware; that hardware contains Multics specific features that are needed to implement Multics. Segment tables, Rings, Gates and more. enable the…

  13. comment
    Comment #24713787

    The website will be back online soon; the system can be accessed ssh dps8@m.trnsz.com

  14. comment
    Comment #24426122

    https://multicians.org/mgs.html#segment segment User-visible subdivision of a process's address space, mapped onto a storage system file. Each segment is 1MB long, and has a zero a…

  15. comment
    Comment #22981797

    But oddly, in Multics they became "ec" (execute command maybe?). r 13:41 0.055 7 ls >sc1>system_start_up.ec Segments = 1, Lengths = 2. r w 2 system_start_up.ec

  16. comment
    Comment #22587415

    http://bitsavers.trailing-edge.com/pdf/honeywell/multics/AN5...

  17. comment
    Comment #22487054

    Porting is unfeasible; Multics relies on hardware features not available. An emulator for the original hardware can be found at: http://ringzero.wikidot.com/ Information about Mult…

  18. comment
    Comment #21130431

    I would argue that Multics security was due more to the ring and gate hardware architecture, that security was designed into the software from day 0 (rather then being grafted in a…

  19. comment
    Comment #20698988

    Getting multiple CPUs running has been quite an adventure.

  20. comment
    Comment #20475835

    PL/I doesn't prevent memory access bugs, but it makes it easier to do good programming. For example, parameters are passed by descriptor, so the allocated size is passed allowing r…

  21. comment
    Comment #19606530

    And two systems to the NSA.

  22. comment
    Comment #19600769

    A writeup is on my round tuit list; some day soon. PL/I does bounds checking on arrays, but not on pointers. The Kermit server allocated an insufficiently large buffer to decompres…

  23. comment
    Comment #19598837

    Sadly, a buffer overflow attack has been found; it is possible to write bad PL/I. (The defective code is a user-space tool, so at best, a remote code exploit. No privilege escalati…

  24. comment
    Comment #19598724

    The bulk of Multics is written in PL/I. See https://multicians.org/pl1.html for details.