Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — unpopular42

unpopular42

HN member
Joined
Thu, Apr 19, 2018, 6:30 PM UTC
HN karma
88
Public activity
93 items

About unpopular42

This account will voice unpopular opinions until the karma falls below 42. Then it will voice popular opinions until the karma raises above 42 again.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #38136421

    > they created $900 in value No. The company had created this value. If it was just the employee, I invite the employee to try quitting and creating this value without the company.…

  2. comment
    Comment #37952800

    > how hard every company fights This only shows that companies believe that unions are harmful for them. Which I support, as usually unions are bad for both companies and workers >…

  3. comment
    Comment #37902265

    > the evidence that they are extremely beneficial to workers Could you please cite the evidence? > While the CEO owns a couple private jets and the company initiates another billio…

  4. comment
    Comment #37547242

    See the thread below: https://news.ycombinator.com/threads?id=unpopular42#37543571 And just to be clear, climate regulations are not the same as pollution laws

  5. comment
    Comment #37546978

    The article wants to convince you in something and naturally the visuals are adjusted to help that goal. Have a look at the raw data if you like. So far, as much as I can see, the …

  6. comment
    Comment #37546880

    > So we should just hope this all away? No, absolutely not! > But where that starts is legislation. No, absolutely not! Where it starts is invention and invention is currently seve…

  7. comment
    Comment #37544346

    Imagine regulatory asphyxiation disappears. Imagine energy tech gets its own Moore's law. Imagine cheap abundant energy, say 10 orders of magnitude from now in a few decades. Heati…

  8. comment
    Comment #37543576

    Because the current climate spending is extremely inefficient and stupid. For example, if we put all this effort into making more energy, e.g. making nuclear actually work, we coul…

  9. comment
    Comment #37543554

    It was record high the whole year. http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/files/2023/09/asina_S_iqr_...

  10. comment
    Comment #37543533

    I'm not sure what this is supposed to mean. It's not like you have more than one

  11. comment
    Comment #37543461

    [flagged]

  12. comment
    Comment #37543021

    Did we also panic in 2014 that was above average by a similar margin? I just can't remember

  13. comment
    Comment #37069226

    > are you really asking me to explain why skin color is part of a demographic No, I didn't ask that.

  14. comment
    Comment #37069217

    Now you are just lying and calling names. I'll try one more time before I give up. The original author wrote the word "white", not me. There are many ways to segment a population -…

  15. comment
    Comment #37069023

    You don't know that. "White" can mean either, but it didn't matter because both interpretations are equally bad. See for example https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_people Replac…

  16. comment
    Comment #37068919

    Please explain how skin color is relevant in the interview context and why it was specifically mentioned in the original post. Please explain how skin color is different from race …

  17. comment
    Comment #37067511

    She didn't complain about the panel members being exclusively educated people (which does affect how you think). But she did complain that they are all white (which doesn't). So ye…

  18. comment
    Comment #37064243

    > exactly how unbiased is it when every person I interviewed with was exactly my demographic? (White, female, American/western European) Please could someone explain how is this, c…

  19. comment
    Comment #37027527

    No way! A political index that doesn't actually reflect the reality, has that ever happened?

  20. comment
    Comment #36932703

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entrenching_tool

  21. comment
    Comment #36932308

    Note: 'can kill' >= 'has killed', you have only shown the latter.

  22. comment
    Comment #36929959

    Enforcement isn't lacking, it's just done counter-productively. About 20% of US prison population is already for drug offences, and of course it doesn't help anything. There is abs…

  23. comment
    Comment #36929760

    I'm not sure what's your point. But the direct answer is, it's a very similar number of people, not even an order of magnitude difference.

  24. comment
    Comment #36929430

    > The leading causes Did you just make my point? Drugs are already very regulated. > Maybe there is a need for regulation? Probably not.

  25. comment
    Comment #36929424

    You are presenting it like "certification" is some kind of guarantee. The reality is that it isn't. Industrial accidents happen all the time and it remains to be proven that certif…