Viewing profile — ugwigr

The community should know when the content is materially altered.

in your opinion it is right, in my opinion it is wrong.

"more than any other online forum would do" - still does not mean it is right "super labor intensive to boot" - it should be in the CMS code to show a flag if "edited".

got it. Makes sense.

- "get everything you have to say flagged." I do not care about comments getting flagged or HN karma - " happens all the time" . perhaps this is why it is important to consider whe…

- "you expect"- wrong! - at no point did i express my "expectation". I was voicing my opinion on how I think the UX should work for this use case - "instead of the way it already w…

why would i want HN to hold my hand?

ok. what did you disagree with if not my point? I do not care in the least bit about HN's karma

yes it is, captain obvious. now what is the entitlement you allude to?

think of the UI as a funnel - to expect the same number of readers for each comment as for the subject is stupidity

exactly

does not mean it is right

as I suggested, admins should feel free to delete my post and even ban me from posting - but fundamentally changing what I posted is wrong.

in the comment? how many people would read his comment versus the subject line? Also the fact that he can fundamentally change what a user posts and then choose whether or not to d…

add an indicator to indicate the admin changed what I (@ugwigr) posted. Materially changing the content your users post is wrong.

the HN admin changed the link I posted. this is unethical - You are fundamentally changing what I posted. As a product manager here is a better solution - A.) Add a clear indicator…