Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — u-dissolve

u-dissolve

HN member
Joined
Mon, Sep 23, 2019, 9:26 PM UTC
HN karma
64
Public activity
15 items

About u-dissolve

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #21296535

    Google profits from advertising; Google collects data for advertising. Apple profits from iPhones; Apple conforms to censorship to keep their biggest (population-wise) customer. Co…

  2. comment
    Comment #21296509

    Apple does not advertise their streaming service as "family-friendly." It's surprising that they didn't make a single bid on a show as big as South Park.

  3. comment
    Comment #21296299

    I made the title that because it was the part of the article I was most interested in. I changed the title to "Apple won't bid on 'South Park' streaming rights fearing controversy …

  4. story
  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #21269776

    Yes, but brute forcing would take longer to do. Could they also hash it, say, a few thousand times in order to increase the cost of brute forcing? Isn't some layer of obfuscation b…

  7. story
    Ask HN: Could Wikipedia show hashed IP addresses instead?

    When an unregistered Wikipedia user makes a contribution, it shows the IP address from which the edit was made instead of a username. In the interest of privacy, could Wikipedia in…

  8. comment
    Comment #21249113

    From a HN user who used to work on circumventing ad-blockers: "The hardest to beat is uBlock Origin" https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=21036260

  9. story
  10. comment
    Comment #21236228

    I don't think the course itself breaks any criteria. It was just a big loop, so any slopes or tailwind would not help the runner. "Each lap of the course featured two 4.3-kilometre…

  11. comment
    Comment #21236072

    What, specifically, made this attempt (and the Breaking2 attempt) not eligible for a world record? Pacemakers are allowed under IAAF criteria: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of…

  12. comment
    Comment #21186516

    This simply isn't true - your most sensitive information is not public, yet is shared with 3rd parties. From their privacy policy: "We collect location information about you includ…

  13. comment
    Comment #21177133

    This reminds me of the time when stack exchange updated their terms of service to include an arbitration clause. The community was in uproar over this decision, yet the clause stan…

  14. comment
    Comment #21154650

    It doesn't matter how they are using the data, what matters is how they can use the data. We shouldn't trust that they will always do the right thing for citizens' privacy.

  15. comment
    Comment #21054058

    tosdr.org (Terms of service; didn't read) is a website that simplifies website's Terms of Service and Privacy Policy to make it easier for people to read. Stack Overflow is given t…