Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — tynes

tynes

HN member
Joined
Fri, Mar 18, 2016, 4:08 PM UTC
HN karma
18
Public activity
21 items

About tynes

software engineer, previously studied neuroscience, interested in big data in biology and decentralizing the powers that be

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #22724899

    Solving #1 is interesting because it would also be useful if you didn't care to use a Handshake name and also didn't want to depend on the traditional CA system. It could save the …

  2. comment
    Comment #22312072

    Handshake is very different than Namecoin. Its possible to come to this conclusion by doing any amount of research. Please consider thinking before speaking in tribalism. There is …

  3. comment
    Comment #22312016

    In blockchains, there is a difference between consensus and policy. The way that the Handshake recursive resolver works is not based on consensus. This means that people can insert…

  4. comment
    Comment #22311511

    I think ENS is queried more often in a different context than DNS, since many people access it via JSON RPC over HTTP. The interface is an Ethereum contract, although records could…

  5. comment
    Comment #22311293

    > If names have to be renewed on a year-by-year basis, is there any mechanism for archival? Won't this be strictly worse for link rot? Blockchains are good for timestamping. The re…

  6. comment
    Comment #21002651

    Proof of Work solves that by preventing Sybil attacks - it's costly to mine (which is equivalent to signing off on, because it wouldn't make sense to sign an invalid block, you wou…

  7. comment
    Comment #21002624

    Just make a fun website that is only accessible through the system. Businesses can own a cryptographic asset (their domain name) that can accrue value based on services provided. P…

  8. comment
    Comment #21001783

    The JS implemention is a fork of bcoin, the JS Bitcoin full node and production backend. It binds to libunbound but you are right that you would want a lower level language for it …

  9. comment
    Comment #20627509

    Yes but you risk keeping keys online

  10. comment
    Comment #20627484

    Handshake is for top level domains. You can do quick updates using traditional DNS infrastructure at a domain underneath a Handshake top level domain. The benefit is that you have …

  11. comment
    Comment #20627451

    To update DNS records, you need to submit a valid transaction to the network. People generally do not keep their keys connected to the internet to prevent this type of problem. It …

  12. comment
    Comment #20627439

    Unfortunately the seeder peers aren't up right now, see here for a fresh peers list https://hnscan.com/peers

  13. comment
    Comment #20627385

    The way the the ENS integration would work is the DNS request for vitalik.eth would end up at a Handshake Authoritative Name Server and then there are certain blacklisted top level…

  14. comment
    Comment #19530262

    Satoshi Labs should consider a donation :) Since Trezor devices now support many coins, I'm sure that there is a much higher demand for the devices. If you are a purist, please upd…

  15. comment
    Comment #19241732

    If you have any interest in participating in the community, please visit https://handshake.community

  16. comment
    Comment #19241063

    Human intervention is important to the proper functioning of blockchain protocols. It's a myth that blockchains can just operate in a completely objective way without people. The p…

  17. comment
    Comment #19241036

    User experience around key management is poor. I agree that it needs to be improved, Handshake supports the industry standard HD Key Derivation following bip44 and has Ledger Nano …

  18. comment
    Comment #19240982

    The root of trust comes from the accumulated proof of work instead of an organization. This is interesting because self signed certificates can be trustworthy if they are signed wi…

  19. comment
    Comment #19240451

    Handshake (handshake.org) provides an SPV Proof that the DNS records held in it's zone are authentic. This means if an attacker wanted to spoof records, they would have to: 1) Ecli…

  20. comment
    Comment #18760785

    I wish IBM could turn itself around

  21. comment
    Comment #12940828

    I know of multiple bootcamp grads that currently work at Google. It is a thing