Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — txrx0000

txrx0000

HN member
Joined
Tue, Aug 26, 2025, 4:57 AM UTC
HN karma
662
Public activity
243 items

About txrx0000

hello

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49252605

    Big tech companies aside, the broader tech community did not fail to engage on the digital parenting problem. We could've solved this problem long ago before anyone even noticed it…

  2. comment
    Comment #49252407

    We should not ignore it, but firmly dismiss it with reason. The recent Illinois law that applies to all Internet-capable operating systems is blatantly unconstitutional. People sho…

  3. comment
    Comment #49251017

    This is worse than the California one. Since this applies to all Internet-capable operating systems, it's effectively forcing people to utter their age bracket in order to communic…

  4. comment
    Comment #49243012

    While this is true, it's not an all-or-nothing game. A little bit of countersurveillance is better than none, even if you're not that savvy. We can win by gradually raising the per…

  5. comment
    Comment #49228573

    That's a somewhat accurate description, and you could even replace "society" with "universe". But what I'm defending is precisely the apparent feeling of autonomy, which is just ca…

  6. comment
    Comment #49222637

    It's not just the government. The government sneakily adds stuff they think only they can exploit, but skilled non-state actors can exploit hardware features regardless of whether …

  7. comment
    Comment #49178275

    For better or for worse, this is valid criticism. Ensuring alignment to the human individual is not even a software-only problem, and I suspect gwern doesn't realize this yet. Your…

  8. comment
    Comment #49149729

    This is the correct intuition. The problem can be solved with antitrust by forcing hardware vendors to ship their devices without an operating system . Then the market will deliver…

  9. comment
    Comment #49149552

    > So saying "we should allow unfettered access to the internet" or even "it's the parents' responsibility" is naive, dismissive and has failed. The market failure to provide an ade…

  10. comment
    Comment #49141364

    You compare LLMs to spellcheckers, but they are clearly very different in capability at this point. These agents are becoming more human-like and "just a tool" is no longer a fair …

  11. comment
    Comment #49118578

    Correct observations. But have you wondered why those solutions are ineffective? Kids nowadays use phones and tablets for the most part. They don't even know how to use a computer …

  12. comment
    Comment #49099303

    Bio-digital integration will tighten in the meantime. I suspect neural interfaces will have blurred the line between my model and my brain by the time the model is wildly superinte…

  13. comment
    Comment #49095734

    > It sounds like you believe that big labs are irresponsible. Wouldn't this support the notion of creating a pause mechanism for use in an emergency, as advocated in the OP? Irresp…

  14. comment
    Comment #49095342

    > Human intelligence has been quite harmful to the species we've driven extinct! AI intelligence could be similar for our species. I don't think this central premise is true, with …

  15. comment
    Comment #49094348

    We have to stop comparing nuclear weapons with general intelligence. They are nothing alike. Nukes are weapons of mass destruction that can only destroy or deter. Intelligence is d…

  16. comment
    Comment #49093703

    Is this a bot? As soon as I linked to this thread in another comment, you show up bootlicking the establishment. Forgive me if you're an actual user, but your account has basically…

  17. comment
    Comment #49093117

    It's ironic that the top reply to a comment about quality of discourse on this site is an ad hominem. Most people here take AI progress very seriously judging by the number of post…

  18. comment
    Comment #49093052

    There is constructive discourse, but this kind of commentary doesn't get to the top: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49078376 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49077753 It'…

  19. comment
    Comment #49091952

    I often see this parallel being drawn between general intelligence and nuclear weapons, and you seem genuinely concerned, so I'll try to explain why this concern is misplaced. Inte…

  20. comment
    Comment #49080497

    > It teaches it to mimic all possible humans, inferring what sort of persona to take depending on the context. This is of course correct, but that's exactly what I meant by aligned…

  21. comment
    Comment #49079259

    You claim the pretraining distribution is not good enough, but provide no alternative methods that are better. The pretrained model is currently our best approximation of humanity'…

  22. comment
    Comment #49078592

    I do seriously want general intelligence to be widely available with no guardrails, and there are very good reasons for this. If you want to read about it: https://news.ycombinator…

  23. comment
    Comment #49078376

    On Dario's concerns: It is very relevant whether frontier capabilities and research continue to be diffused in the open, because leveling the intelligence playing field empowers or…

  24. comment
    Comment #49036013

    Thanks to your comment, I realized I've not successfully refuted Hume. The possibility of a truth value change is not a new piece of info about the future. We did arrive at it by d…

  25. comment
    Comment #49034988

    Article correctly identified symptoms but not root cause. Course correction is desperately needed, but a luddite movement is not the way. If this movement gains traction, it will p…