Viewing profile — txrx0000
txrx0000
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Aug 26, 2025, 4:57 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 662
- Public activity
- 243 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About txrx0000
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49252605
Big tech companies aside, the broader tech community did not fail to engage on the digital parenting problem. We could've solved this problem long ago before anyone even noticed it…
-
comment
Comment #49252407
We should not ignore it, but firmly dismiss it with reason. The recent Illinois law that applies to all Internet-capable operating systems is blatantly unconstitutional. People sho…
-
comment
Comment #49251017
This is worse than the California one. Since this applies to all Internet-capable operating systems, it's effectively forcing people to utter their age bracket in order to communic…
-
comment
Comment #49243012
While this is true, it's not an all-or-nothing game. A little bit of countersurveillance is better than none, even if you're not that savvy. We can win by gradually raising the per…
-
comment
Comment #49228573
That's a somewhat accurate description, and you could even replace "society" with "universe". But what I'm defending is precisely the apparent feeling of autonomy, which is just ca…
-
comment
Comment #49222637
It's not just the government. The government sneakily adds stuff they think only they can exploit, but skilled non-state actors can exploit hardware features regardless of whether …
-
comment
Comment #49178275
For better or for worse, this is valid criticism. Ensuring alignment to the human individual is not even a software-only problem, and I suspect gwern doesn't realize this yet. Your…
-
comment
Comment #49149729
This is the correct intuition. The problem can be solved with antitrust by forcing hardware vendors to ship their devices without an operating system . Then the market will deliver…
-
comment
Comment #49149552
> So saying "we should allow unfettered access to the internet" or even "it's the parents' responsibility" is naive, dismissive and has failed. The market failure to provide an ade…
-
comment
Comment #49141364
You compare LLMs to spellcheckers, but they are clearly very different in capability at this point. These agents are becoming more human-like and "just a tool" is no longer a fair …
-
comment
Comment #49118578
Correct observations. But have you wondered why those solutions are ineffective? Kids nowadays use phones and tablets for the most part. They don't even know how to use a computer …
-
comment
Comment #49099303
Bio-digital integration will tighten in the meantime. I suspect neural interfaces will have blurred the line between my model and my brain by the time the model is wildly superinte…
-
comment
Comment #49095734
> It sounds like you believe that big labs are irresponsible. Wouldn't this support the notion of creating a pause mechanism for use in an emergency, as advocated in the OP? Irresp…
-
comment
Comment #49095342
> Human intelligence has been quite harmful to the species we've driven extinct! AI intelligence could be similar for our species. I don't think this central premise is true, with …
-
comment
Comment #49094348
We have to stop comparing nuclear weapons with general intelligence. They are nothing alike. Nukes are weapons of mass destruction that can only destroy or deter. Intelligence is d…
-
comment
Comment #49093703
Is this a bot? As soon as I linked to this thread in another comment, you show up bootlicking the establishment. Forgive me if you're an actual user, but your account has basically…
-
comment
Comment #49093117
It's ironic that the top reply to a comment about quality of discourse on this site is an ad hominem. Most people here take AI progress very seriously judging by the number of post…
-
comment
Comment #49093052
There is constructive discourse, but this kind of commentary doesn't get to the top: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49078376 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49077753 It'…
-
comment
Comment #49091952
I often see this parallel being drawn between general intelligence and nuclear weapons, and you seem genuinely concerned, so I'll try to explain why this concern is misplaced. Inte…
-
comment
Comment #49080497
> It teaches it to mimic all possible humans, inferring what sort of persona to take depending on the context. This is of course correct, but that's exactly what I meant by aligned…
-
comment
Comment #49079259
You claim the pretraining distribution is not good enough, but provide no alternative methods that are better. The pretrained model is currently our best approximation of humanity'…
-
comment
Comment #49078592
I do seriously want general intelligence to be widely available with no guardrails, and there are very good reasons for this. If you want to read about it: https://news.ycombinator…
-
comment
Comment #49078376
On Dario's concerns: It is very relevant whether frontier capabilities and research continue to be diffused in the open, because leveling the intelligence playing field empowers or…
-
comment
Comment #49036013
Thanks to your comment, I realized I've not successfully refuted Hume. The possibility of a truth value change is not a new piece of info about the future. We did arrive at it by d…
-
comment
Comment #49034988
Article correctly identified symptoms but not root cause. Course correction is desperately needed, but a luddite movement is not the way. If this movement gains traction, it will p…