Viewing profile — txmachinery
txmachinery
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Nov 17, 2020, 2:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 26
- Public activity
- 34 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About txmachinery
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #25367407
So, we are left to wonder why YT suddenly cares so very much about foreign countries being accused of meddling in the US election.
-
comment
Comment #25364422
I wouldn't regard those downvotes as valid. There is a large and vocal group on this thread with no apparent regard for HN's culture. They appear to be from "out of town".
-
comment
Comment #25364297
Not an article, but a large amount of well-organised evidence (not great on mobile): https://hereistheevidence.com CodeMonkeyZ on Twitter is biased, but links to interesting materi…
-
comment
Comment #25364170
Or the commentary is largely coming from those normally absent from HN.
-
comment
Comment #25364060
Where is the evidence? Https://hereistheevidence.com
-
comment
Comment #25333063
As I explained, most of the research indicating positive results is old (meaning before the 70's). Though there were some in the 90's (eg, William Rea et al. https://eloverkanslig.…
-
comment
Comment #25330748
Possibly relevant (Baghdad Battery): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baghdad_Battery
-
comment
Comment #25330621
Shantaram is incredible, I can only think of the original Dune novels by Frank Herbert as comparable in depth, scope and revelation of what it is to be human. Shantaram's author cl…
-
comment
Comment #25330537
In principle it leaks information, so is always worse practice than not leaking. For example, one could imagine an edge-case where given a set of average-colour password images col…
-
comment
Comment #25326759
Or they do, are rare, and haven't yet been reliably identified: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31640707/ The fact that the "new name" (IEI) seems to ignore/discredit the primary c…
-
comment
Comment #25326394
I can well understand this being true. Without discounting it, I've also had roughly equivalent, but opposite experiences, with flight mode and sleep.
-
comment
Comment #25326365
Yes, I would generally agree. But I think it's fine, and justified to investigate the (many) claims of EMF sensitivity. People having a seizure because they walked past someone eat…
-
comment
Comment #25322770
Yes, and do you know the difference between science and conjecture? Practice and theory? Done any research into people who are medically hyper-sensitive, sometimes at the milliwatt…
-
comment
Comment #25322659
Maybe the commenter simply believes that it might not be crazy to exhibit concern for something that's known to be dangerous enough weaponise, is invisible, silent and being deploy…
-
comment
Comment #25322543
How bizarre, I'd been led to believe wireless energy was completely harmless; safe to use in the home, upon ones person daily and even distribute randomly in concentrated areas en …
-
comment
Comment #25317967
"Maybe we shouldn't want" is a strange statement. It simultaneously appears to acknowledge widespread desire for something, along with an apparent minority view that wanting that t…
-
comment
Comment #25282654
Yes, I would use it every booking.
-
comment
Comment #25279861
Ah, that's great. Thanks!
-
comment
Comment #25279506
Thank you. The power bank may work as a hardware solution sometimes, though even in a pocket, any battery can fail if the outside temps are low enough (as they often are in winter …
-
story
Ask HN: Could a phone at sub-zero (C), heated by load, result in net inc. usage?
Those who've spent time in a sufficiently cold environment (below zero C), and spent time outside with a fully-charged phone, may have experienced taking it out to snap a photo, on…
-
comment
Comment #25252774
And when you're done playing Flappy Bird, there's always Flappy Bird Within Flappy Bird: https://www.lexaloffle.com/bbs/?tid=29323
-
comment
Comment #25252682
I appreciate your good-natured discussion, but disagree: my statements were factual, and it's not strange to present hubris as an indicator of untrustworthiness.
-
comment
Comment #25248583
You could indeed see yourself as being "fact-checked". But this doesn't mean the person attempting to persuade you of their point of view thinks of themselves as a "fact-checker", …
-
comment
Comment #25248353
I read it as: self-annointed arbiters of truth demean themselves by their own definition as such. Trustworthy sources of information accept the limits of their knowledge and recogn…
-
comment
Comment #25244619
Possibly qualifying - a game called Everything: https://store.steampowered.com/app/582270/Everything/