Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — tuxiano

tuxiano

HN member
Joined
Thu, Jan 10, 2008, 9:39 AM UTC
HN karma
20
Public activity
14 items

About tuxiano

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #23550948

    My hypothesis is that learning chess is such a long path that people tend to forget how they were when they started and think their current level games are not interesting to share…

  2. comment
    Comment #23494410

    The match you are referring to was played under tournament conditions that clearly handicapped the human Grandmaster. I read from the report of the match [0] that "The total time f…

  3. comment
    Comment #23494333

    Chess engine ratings are not immediately comparable to human ratings as they are extracted from different pools. Hydra played relatively few games so its rating estimation was some…

  4. comment
    Comment #23494236

    Sometimes if you play a move and the first plies (i.e. half moves) of the main variation the computer starts "understanding" and its score changes accordingly. Those are the cases …

  5. comment
    Comment #23494040

    There are a lot of engines with rating on the chart way higher than the best humans, so every suggestion on their part should be in theory enough to overcome any human opponent. In…

  6. comment
    Comment #23493918

    I can't speak for Go but in Chess the best players in the world understand the nuances of a position still better than the computer engines and - if occasionally proven wrong by th…

  7. comment
    Comment #23493899

    I don't know the last one but I recall the matches of Hydra chess machine [0] in the early 2000s against GM Adams in tournament condition (5½ to ½ for the machine) and against GM N…

  8. comment
    Comment #23493883

    Occasionally it is possible. After seven years and more than one hundred games played I can tell you that I have been surprised by my opponent's reply not more than an handful of t…

  9. comment
    Comment #23493398

    You are right if by "better" you mean "competitively stronger at tournament or rapid conditions". Humans are still way stronger strategically and competitively if given enough time…

  10. comment
    Comment #23493357

    In official correspondence games the computer assistance is allowed so most (if not all) of the players usually start their analysis with the computer suggestions (Stockfish, Lc0 o…

  11. comment
    Comment #23493220

    The rating you are referring to are typically based on tournament or rapid games, where the limited time induces the human players to mistakes that the computer capitalizes on. Giv…

  12. comment
    Comment #23493154

    I strongly disagree. The best correspondence chess players often improve over the computer suggestions. It takes time, energy and a great strategic knowledge, but it’s still possib…

  13. comment
    Comment #23493113

    I suppose he can’t because it isn’t true at all. The best correspondence players usually improve significantly over the computer suggestions. Source: I’m a corrspondence chess inte…

  14. comment
    Comment #96728

    python in this world, lisp in paradise