Viewing profile — ttctciyf
ttctciyf
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jul 25, 2013, 2:06 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,011
- Public activity
- 892 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ttctciyf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49143496
The only explosive growth we're seeing out of the ongoing tech bonanza is growth in inequality, afaics.
-
comment
Comment #49143445
Yes! As a frequent user of youtube queues, it feels like they have a dedicated team of one or two junior devs to futz around with it on a weekly basis and zero QA, because it is al…
-
comment
Comment #49076863
We're really getting into Computers Don't Argue [0] territory here, eh? 0: see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computers_Don%27t_Argue (available in Best of Creative Computing Vol. 2…
-
comment
Comment #49076615
I've long admired Chaitin for his original thinking and especially his ability to clearly convey his ideas about foundations, complexity and information in concise and digestible s…
-
comment
Comment #48566382
> @ttctciyf you are marked dead. Not sure why. Beats me too! Thanks for the heads up.
-
comment
Comment #48553806
Clearly Amazon don't want their code fixed.
-
comment
Comment #48553255
Reminds me of something I saw on shadertoy a while back: > wiggly string-like texture from treating a noise field as an angle and sampling the curvature, with some dodgy trig. http…
-
comment
Comment #48382144
archive.ph came through on this one: https://archive.ph/fM7jf
-
comment
Comment #48382046
Me too. From duckduck's search result excerpt it seems to be something of a departure from the normal string theory skepticism at Peter Woit's blog: > The US/Israeli wars and threa…
-
comment
Comment #48379474
Baseline epistemic hygiene would tend to preclude taking llm advice seriously, on any personal matter of consequence, in my view. However "baseline" epistemic hygiene seems to be a…
-
comment
Comment #48379432
Personally, as a gmail user of about 2 decades, this is the first I've heard of this particular issue, probably because for some years I don't even read past the word "smart" befor…
-
comment
Comment #48368435
I mean the implications and ramifications are fascinating, but .. I just need to take a few moments to absorb the sheer spectacular stupendous glorious DUMBNESS of a multibillion d…
-
comment
Comment #48367950
Personally it seems mostly about prizing the phone number out of my cold clammy hands. I recently tried to access my google account on a new browser install. Google did not believe…
-
comment
Comment #48357370
You can accomplish "no ads" and arguably substantially less tracking without Premium, though, with (e.g.) firefox and ublock origin. The only downside is an occasional ignorable wa…
- story
-
comment
Comment #48348380
If browsers have enough low-level access to my storage hardware to carry out timing attacks for fingerprinting, it seems likely they also have enough to maliciously chug the hardwa…
-
comment
Comment #48298256
If you don't care about the facticity of the answer, AI is less clicks, granted.
-
comment
Comment #47992727
I'll definitely be keeping an eye on Roguelike Radio[0], still putting out episodes - 3 already this year! - to see if any coverage emerges. 0: http://www.roguelikeradio.com/
-
comment
Comment #47551682
See also: https://ddosecrets.org/article/kash-patel-emails
-
comment
Comment #47488258
noscript, ublock origin, reader view: the referenced page loads in 2s on a bad connection and downloads no ads while remaining perfectly readable. Browsing and not using these tool…
-
comment
Comment #46767855
Probably asked an llm
-
comment
Comment #46669742
Those are not mutually exclusive in this instance, it seems.
-
comment
Comment #46669730
Maybe it's intended to avoid legal liability resulting from reproducing copyright material not licensed for training?
-
comment
Comment #46405630
The agnotologists[1] have never had it so good! The production of ignorance is booming as its trajectory takes it from roots in advertising, then lobbying, then political campaigns…
-
comment
Comment #46405495
> Perhaps you can tell me what use "3 ∩ 4 = 3" has. As I said: > a handy set theoretic implementation of the min() function. i.e. if you wanted (for whatever reason) to define min(…